Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 04 12:28:28 EST 2008 | jseagle
1.0mm (0.039") 1.75X >0.5 to 1.0mm (0.02 to 0.039") 4X 0.25 to 0.5mm (0.00984 to 0.02") 10X
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 08 20:23:28 EDT 2004 | KEN
Philips Emerald & Emerald-X is specified at max 54mm device. However I have placed 58mm devices. These machines have published accuracies at 0.02mm. Have seen as low as 0.007mm.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 18:41:07 EDT 2000 | Darby
Sorry, scale division on that would be 0.05mm not 0.02mm. Magnification x24 or thereabouts. Also great for measuring all sort of things on pcbs, stencils etc to see if they come within spec.
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 20:34:02 EDT 2002 | ppwlee
A gap of 150-200� between potential shadow components is enough to eliminate those problems. Dave, Can you clarify? Do you mean 0.015 to 0.02?? Peter
Electronics Forum | Tue May 03 15:15:33 EDT 2005 | dphilbrick
The biggest problem is getting paste on the board. We ran a board that had 8 per and would get an occasional insufficient solder joint. I would look into doing the boards with something like a SiPad process (www.sipad.net) My $0.02
Electronics Forum | Sun Aug 21 15:54:15 EDT 2005 | Ken
not to be anoying....but a topaz can be configured with a 54mm camera an when using the 20 micron head 1 spline. It will place accuratly to +/-0.02mm Imagine 1 machine that works from 0402 to 54mm square! Now that's flexible.
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 07 07:56:12 EDT 2006 | Chunks
Hi AJ, I have never used the Pulsar, but have seen it. I worry about it clogging all the time. Also being "hand held" over a hot pot wories me too. Look for something automated. My $0.02 and only an opinion.
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 15 05:37:49 EDT 2006 | Rob
Are you talking 0.02" (1.225mm) if so then no it's not a great idea. if you must wave it can you go to a PLCC and through hole socket it on the other side of the board?
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 19 10:08:10 EST 2006 | George
Grant, Why don't you try a water-base flux which is No-clean, VOC-free also? I have tried the 270WR flux from AIM with good results even on lead-free process. My $0.02, George
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 27 09:17:43 EDT 2007 | gregf912
I have set the PQ with the CP6 station jigs. It is dialed in to 0.02mm of zero. I also checked station 5.
