Electronics Forum: 0.125mm (Page 1 of 1)

QFN's and LGA's

Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 15:39:16 EDT 2009 | mikesewell

Amkor's MLF guidelines are very similar to Actels. 1 to 1 on the stencil to part pad on the I/O pads, 75% with a grid windowpane, 0.125 mm/5 mil stencil. For example, the Actel area ratio for a 0.3 mm sq. pad and 0.125 mm stencil is 0.6 which seems

0402 stencil design

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 04 22:28:16 EST 2003 | davef

You could reduce the paste by about 70%. Solder balling and tombstoning will be the issues to fight. The drivers to these don't change with the component size. Use the fine SMTnet Archives for background. Aperture Size and Thickness of Solder Pas

Stencil for BGA re-balling

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 11 09:19:17 EST 2008 | davef

By the way you asked the question, we assume that by "reballing" you mean bumping, we should be able to figure that out: * Volume of the ball = ( pi*d^�)/6 = [355/113] *0.6*0.6*0.6]/6 = 0.11mm^3 * Volume of solder required = 2*volume of ball = 2*0.11

gas to extend allowed print-to-place time?

Electronics Forum | Mon May 02 12:35:33 EDT 2016 | adamjs

Or try : http://www.sipad.com/ I think sipad is incredibly cool and would be the perfect solution, but is way too expensive. We're paying $0.80/each for four-layer ENIG boards, 50cm^2 with 0.125mm trace/space and 0.8mm-pitch LGA landings in lots of

QFP Shifting / Solderability Issue

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 01 22:49:50 EDT 2007 | mika

These ones from ALTERA the QFFP-304 0.5mm weight: 32gr. used to give us a really headache in the past. Not only soldering issue:s but also the placement in x-y-theta! The stencil thickness of ours is 0.13mm and because of ohter compomponent packages,

  1  

0.125mm searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information