Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 06 11:39:17 EST 2009 | 14367
As you know, the H1N1 virus is on the move, and we are trying to take precautions. We wish to use a 60% alcohol based lotion for disinfecting our hands. It has been questioned if the added substances could be detrimental to electronic assembly board
Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 03 12:30:39 EDT 2009 | tpappano
I haven't experienced a 'scare', but have experienced the H1N1. Exactly 52 hours from onset of symptoms back to normal.
Electronics Forum | Sun Oct 04 22:42:45 EDT 2009 | isd_jwendell
I am just now recovering from the flu, probably H1N1 from symptoms and the source. I've seen worse flu's, but this one is bad because of how easily it spreads. Everyone in the family caught this one. What if it was a killer, like in years long ago?
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 09 22:57:42 EDT 2009 | davef
Concerns are: * We are unsure how a germicide like Purell affects a virus like H1N1. The CDC recommends washing your hands with soap and water. * Purell is flammable.
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 11 14:20:59 EDT 2009 | davef
Bottom line: Whether you provide Purell or not, people will be using more of it, because it's cheap and they believe it might work in protecting them against H1N1. So, we're going to end-up with more of it on our boards.
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 06 18:40:25 EST 2009 | davef
While you're waiting for others to reply, look here: http://www.smtnet.com/Forums/index.cfm?fuseaction=view_thread&CFApp=1&Thread_ID=13874&mc=19
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 09 15:07:39 EDT 2009 | petep
With the H1N1 and other flu virus' upon us, our HR department is planning to place hand sanitizers throughout our facilities. I need to assure the planned product is "electronic friendly" and that it will not adversely affect solderability. Pure
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 09 10:20:56 EST 2009 | davef
Carol: The thread that I posted above is not directed at your question. I'm sorry that I rushed in responding to you. There was two threads posted recently on the topic and I grabbed the wrong one. Here, try this link for a better response: http://
| 1 |
