Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 06 20:02:55 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Ravi: I agree with travis. What's the issue?
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 02 19:43:40 EDT 2000 | Ravi Bhat
One of my customers has asked about concerns, comments, ideas about putting 0402 packages on bottom side of the board. The process will be no clean with reflow/reflow. If anybody out there has some experience or concerns please comment. Regards
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 02 19:42:40 EDT 2000 | Ravi Bhat
One of my customers has asked about concerns, comments, ideas about putting 0402 packages on bottom side of the board. The process will be no clean with reflow/reflow. If anybody out there has some experience or concerns please comment. Regards
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 06 17:20:05 EDT 2000 | Travis Slaughter
There is no difference in 0402�s on the bottom side than 0603 0805 1206. They will not fall off or tombstone, unless they where before you put them in the oven.
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 25 05:42:17 EST 2000 | Istv�n Dominik
Hi, We should wavesolder a PLCC44 package. The PCB is under the design procedure now and we must specify the best parameters (the orientation (45 or 90 degrees) of the package on the PCB,the number, the positon and the size of the solder thief pads
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 25 05:42:17 EST 2000 | Istv�n Dominik
Hi, We should wavesolder a PLCC44 package. The PCB is under the design procedure now and we must specify the best parameters (the orientation (45 or 90 degrees) of the package on the PCB,the number, the positon and the size of the solder thief pads
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 29 15:25:12 EST 2002 | russ
Thanks for the info, I have previously not used the Ps and Qs so to speak and I am finding now that we are running into trouble mostly due to component height and body sizes. So for example we currently have "16 pin SOP" what we need is "16 pin SOP,
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 30 09:28:50 EST 2002 | gregp
How about your designator actually contains size info in a code. For example, SO14-237-050-090. That is "package type" - "width" (over leads) - "lead pitch" - "thickness". The problem with this is a great deal of thought has to be put in before comm
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 10 20:59:02 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Try: View Mate (View only) - http://www.lavenir.com CamCAD (View only) - http://www.camcad.com GC-Prevue (View only) - http://www.graphicode.com PC Gerber II (View & limited data size editing) - http://www.ecam.com/us_home.htm While I've posted "vi
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 24 13:41:25 EDT 2006 | jax
Everybody who uses basic "part-type" naming conventions for machine package codes will have this same issue unless restrictions are placed on who, how, and when the package codes can be altered. Some alternative methods to solving this problem: 1. U
