Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 05 06:59:31 EST 2004 | t_white
We use a SAWA to clean our stencils and it performs quite well on solder paste but not so great with epoxy. Operators find the machine very easy to use and like mentioned before it takes up minimal space and has a lower intial and operating cost.
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 29 18:17:48 EST 2004 | kerryn
It should be noted that some of the main reasons to change from manual cleaning to automated stencil cleaning are: � Manual cleaning is not consistent � quality is totally in the operators hands � Contamination left on the stencil and in the aperture
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 22 14:45:01 EDT 2004 | Michelle Ogihara
As many people have participated in this email string, including competitors and customers of Sawa, I would like to respond to especially one rather detailed email expressing concerns with this stencil cleaning system. Also, this teaches me to keep
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 11 20:24:00 EDT 2001 | davef
Well, your wipes are a good first step in removing the bulk of the material, but they do little or nothing to remove the material from the apertures. * It would probably be cheaper to use poly stencils and then throw them away after each use, eh? ;
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 04 22:57:32 EST 2004 | Ken
I have an Aqueous Technologies stencil cleaner and I can see many SAWA advantages over the "larger" machines. 1. Floor space savings 2. Chemical cost (up to 30 dollars a gallon) 3. Hand ultra sonic cleaning could never destroy the webbing and bon
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 04 20:50:26 EST 2004 | Mike Konrad
There are several companies that manufacturer stencil cleaning systems. They include: Aqueous Technologies www.aqueoustech.com Smartsonic www.smartsonic.com EMC www.emcgti.com PMR www.pmrsystems.com JNJ www.jnj-industries.com UnitDesign www.un
1 |