Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 29 07:12:49 EDT 2003 | Glen barden
Sn/Cu/Ni is introducted to me in wavesoldering lead free process. Around in our industry, we have a plenty of info. about SAC but not on this alloy. The distributor showed me some information about this alloy including less dross, more shiny /smoot
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 10 14:44:42 EST 2006 | greg york
Not sure about Sn/Cu/Ni large market share here in Europe as we have a large part of the UK market with SACP0307 alloy 0.3%Ag introduced over Two years ago Also worked against Sn/Cu/Ni alloy with large TV Co and they went with 0.3%Ag due to reliabili
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 27 09:47:01 EDT 2005 | GCampbell
CEMCO Uk have done testing using SACX0307, SAC305 and Sn/Cu/Ni. The copper dissolution tests (report available) conducted at CEMCO showed that the lowest copper erosion rate was achieved by SACX0307. Regards Gerry
Electronics Forum | Sat Dec 24 08:26:41 EST 2005 | GS
Thank you, very intersting. Seen they've experimented also Sn Cu Ni on wave solder. Rgards............GS
Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 14 15:18:49 EDT 2010 | jmedernach
Hi Phil, If the areas that are "turning gray" are masked, it would lead me to believe that you're simply oxidizing the SnCuNiGe finish on those areas. It's unsightly but not an actual defect. I think it's simply the biproduct of using SN100C as a s
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 23 11:41:53 EST 2005 | GS
Hello, a - does any one of you have experience with PCB finished by SN100C (SnCuNi)? SMT single side? SMT double side? SS/DS plus PTH? b - if yes, what about compatibility with different alloys (ie. SAC)used for SMT or Wave (different me
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 13 07:48:00 EDT 2004 | Dougie
Hi Ken, Our product is consumer, although our product is sold on it's reliability. We run a low volume high mix throughput. Any ideas on timescale for the Ag leaching? Sounds like it could be a safer bet to use Imm Sn boards with the Sn/Cu/Ni bar w
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 27 08:38:03 EDT 2006 | cuculi54986@yahoo.com
I tried some SN100C from AIM... On only one array. It flowed well on the chips but did not like the finish on the SOT23's on the board. I did not have enough arrays to mess around, so we switched it over to SAC305 and had no issues. I'm guessing w
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 11 18:44:42 EST 2006 | fctassembly
Hello Greg, Glad to hear your success with the SACX0307 copy. By the way, does the P mean it contains phosphorus? Does yours also contain bismuth like the SACX0307 (according to their plumbing solder patent for X0307)? In response to your discussion
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 23 14:08:38 EDT 2002 | rocco
Hello My question is if the diferent types of allows that components manufacturers have considered like SnAg,SnCu,SnBi,NiPd,etc for platings instead Pb Have special handling at storage,floor handling and re-using as well as reworking ... Consideri
