Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 23 12:49:10 EST 2010 | gregp
Dilbert is correct. The CS-400E machine is the machine of choice. The component insertions are light guided, the components are automatically presented to the operator and the leads are automatically cut and clinched at programmable lead length and
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 16 11:10:31 EST 2006 | jax
It sounds like you are getting CPH numbers without taking into acount Machine utilization and efficiency. By doing that you can overlook what the real problems are. First find your utilization numbers... available machine run time with respect to th
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 21 13:28:10 EDT 2023 | emeto
There could be several reasons - wrong part setup, wrong program, wrong machine placement. Solution will be to measure part before placement.
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 03 03:13:17 EDT 2004 | V.R.Kini
Bent nozzle can result in vaccum leakage resulting in parts falling during part pick up. Correct this. However, if your machine has laser/vision alignment, you should not be having a problem since these come in to picture after pick up. If you have a
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 04 16:40:06 EST 1999 | Dave F
| Hi, | | For hand placement you should see about 150-200 ppm of errors (solder, placement, values etc) on a board populated of types such as 1206, 0805, SOT, Tantalum etc. . As for solely wrong components (component at wrong location) you can usual
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 12:32:44 EST 2020 | jede
We have had a few large human error, wrong placement in the SMT set up over the past year(same package size placed in the wrong feeder position to where it goes unnoticed) and we are trying to look for possible process improvements to prevent this fr
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 16 11:12:15 EDT 2004 | pr
I agree with Russ, sounds like a golden oppty, for wrong part placement. You may look into dedicating certain feeder locations (high running common parts) so that they won't need to be changed after each job. It can affect tact time but in low volume
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 21 07:32:04 EDT 2004 | podge
Hi, We have been using the Crest Solutions Reelscan system here for about 3 years on 8 lines and it has pretty much eliminated wrong part placement. We use it on a variety of SMT placement machines and i believe it can be adapted to any type of place
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 16:47:31 EST 2020 | jede
We are running a Juki SMT line (3RAL and 2080E). I am not sure there is an option for a component verifier. My thought is a barcode/scanner set up and I am in the process of working on this but waiting on Juki response on a file question. We do use
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 29 18:51:47 EDT 2002 | davef
Consider: * Printing: errors [ie, insufficient, excess, skipping, etc.] paste doesn�t roll in front of squeegee, paste adheres to squeegee at the end of stroke, paste does not release. * Component placement: orientation, wrong component, missing comp
