Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 13 11:21:22 EST 1999 | Patrick O' Herlihy
Can anyone recommend ways of reducing damage to solder masks ... a new wick perhaps. I find that using standard wicks the imposed damage is un-acceptable. Also any good links on the subject of bga rework would be really appreciated in earnest ...
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 11 08:14:55 EDT 2007 | mmjm_1099
I did my directory by using the Fuji Part Data Directory. You can request one through Fuji and have a copy for all programmers. For instance a 3216 resistor is named RECT3216060 or your electrolytic caps ALEC4343540. Hopefully that is what you are as
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 27 09:15:21 EDT 2007 | gregf912
The program that I use is the Fuji calibration program and it works fine on all other equipment that I use it on. The PDs are dialed in at 10% tolerance and the nozzles are new. I see it more on 105 and 1608 parts but it happens on 2012 and 3216 part
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 05 22:31:43 EST 2012 | acsscott
Using the 72A FNC nozzles to place 3216 resistors, and 74F nozzles to place PLCC6 LED's. The LED's ar 5mm x 6.5mm x 2.4mm tall.
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 05 22:33:31 EST 2012 | acsscott
We are trying to optimize it to pick up 8 components, then move over the camera, then to the PCB and place them. In the Mount data, we load heads 2, 4, 6, & 8 with a 3216 Resistor, then them next 4 components are LED's, and are loaded on heads 1, 3,
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 28 17:45:56 EST 2012 | acsscott
So, got the Topaz X up and running. It has (4)FNC nozzles on 2, 4, 6, 8, and (4)74A Nozzles on 1, 3, 5, 7. We are trying to optimize it to pick up 8 components, then move over the camera, then to the PCB and place them. In the Mount data, we load
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 14:23:22 EST 2000 | JAX
Finepi......., If you are going to use a naming convention where a 1206T1 has a height of 1mm why are you using 1206 instead of 3216T1. That is what it should be called to keep the mm across the house! That's just my opinion, I could be wrong!
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 03 07:15:24 EST 2014 | JB
Thanks for the reply, how do people handle different packages then if you can't add new ones? If we had a 1206 sized inductor, then a 1206 sized ferrite bead and so on, they would all have to be grouped under the same generic heading? e.g. Chip-R321
Electronics Forum | Sat Mar 13 19:34:17 EST 1999 | John W.
| | Okay, I would like to hear everyones ideas for PD naming conventions for FUJI. We are trying to use your basic names "3216_CAP" to a "MQFP208AD" But it is way out of control. Different part sizes, and vendors make it very tough to keep it all
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 22 23:52:06 EST 2000 | Finepitch Services
Jax, I appreciate your opinion and no one is right or wrong during such information sharing. Please consider that we all inherit a system and keeping it in the same way is the choice in most cases. Also, "keeping the mm across the house" is not gi