Electronics Forum | Mon May 14 14:24:28 EDT 2012 | smellew
30x30 is ok for CP65 not CP6
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 04 22:52:32 EDT 2003 | hwatali
Now we are in urgent to buy 1.FUJI CP6-4000 or CP6-5000 for 3 sets;2.FUJI CP643E for 2 sets;3.CP6 8��2 and CP6 8��4 paper feeder. If you can supply these to me,pls contact me asap.
Electronics Forum | Sun Jan 20 14:04:49 EST 2002 | cstech
We have a CP6 5000, please kindly inform us the optimal tact time is 0.09 or 0.12. Kindly confirm us the CP65 is same or different to CP6-5000. The CP6-4000 and CP6-500, any different, except on the table size? Hope to recieve your help?!
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 07 10:43:27 EST 2006 | dougs
The E has a different x-y table setup, i seem to remember the CP6 having rollers and cams to control the z table height, the CP6E has a belt driven z axis. Also i think the CP6E is slightly faster, 44K cph against 40K, still just program it as a CP6
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 27 11:07:19 EST 2007 | kpm135
Can anyone tell me the differences between the CP6-4000 and the CP643? Is the CP643 able to place a wider component range? Does the CP643 have some sort of vision system while the CP6-4000 doesn't? If anyone has the Fuji Specs on the CP643 and could
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 19 09:19:01 EST 2002 | Kent
We have been placing 0201 in our production using both CP642 and CP643 since last year. But it was necessary to upgraded a narrow view camera to recognize 0201 for CP642. Since then, the placement of 0201 is really reliable.