Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 15 10:32:01 EDT 2004 | dscott
I have used fuji XP series for about 3-4 years now. We have XP1, XP2 & XP3 in our Prototype Dept. Excellent machines for this purpose. Very easy to program, can edit at the machine, placement, repeatability, reliability is just like any other Fuji
Electronics Forum | Fri May 07 02:27:57 EDT 2004 | Grant Petty
Hi, They do what we need component wise, however I was wondering if anyone had info on reliability, ease of programming. We are looking XP 142 and 242 series chip shooters and fine pitch placers. Regards, Grant Blackmagic Design
Electronics Forum | Sat May 08 09:59:21 EDT 2004 | fastek
What you need to remember is Fuji didn't make a name for itself by building this XP platform. They're strengths are/were in their chipshooters. Don't just assume that because it's Fuji it won't have reliabilty issues. I'm not sold on this platform ye
Electronics Forum | Fri May 07 07:02:52 EDT 2004 | rlackey
Hi Grant, We use the CP series from Fuji - so not quite the same, but the quality of engineering and company philosophy will almost certainly carry over into the XP range. Our machines are totally bombproof reliability wise, and the programming i
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 04 10:18:38 EDT 2004 | drlou
OK, I have some names to go by. I appreciate the info, especially the Quad related stuff, because my company was leaning toward the Quad, and I was concerned about its age and technology. I am going to look into the Fuji XP142E, the Samsung CP40/45,
Electronics Forum | Wed May 19 16:57:08 EDT 2004 | ricardof
We have in our facilities in Mexico more than 150 FUJI machines (CPs, IPs, QPs, GPs), they're in fact Bombproof, but it is not amazing to do that with 1206, SOTs on SOPs, we just feel a kind of disappointed with that 10K hours service, that means yo
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 09 18:51:05 EST 2006 | grantp
Hi, I have used both MYDATA TP9, MY9 and more recently MY12. MYDATA machines are just not accurate, and we did everything possible, and every kind of upgrade they had. We ended up putting in Fuji XP based machines, and the differences are very notic
Electronics Forum | Wed Jun 02 16:33:08 EDT 2004 | davem
Fuji is the best, but there are other alternatives besides Quad. If you really want to look at Fuji, take a peek at their XP142E series. With "Vision processing on the fly" and a "Mini Turret Head" with 12 placement nozzles it should fit your needs n
| 1 |
.gif)
