Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 22 16:20:03 EST 2014 | warwolf
Basically the contract comes first, then the design drawings then IPC. if your costumer is asking you to bend the PCB then it becomes apart of the design drawings. as for looking for a cover, get it in writing that that's what they want you to do. I
Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 18 21:20:58 EST 2006 | Fer
Dave, May I ask where did you find the 1.5%, or the goal of .005" (or .007") per inch? The IPC-A-600 bow and twist standard calls for a .75% based on the calculation of the test method TM-650, method 2.4.22, which calculates the percentage based on
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 16 11:27:57 EDT 2010 | davef
Consider: * Bow & Twist IPC-TM-650; Method 2.4.22 * Previous threads on SMTnet, like: http://www.smtnet.com/Forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=1&Message_ID=54498
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 23 14:03:18 EDT 2001 | Ryan Jennens
Dougie- We,too, have the IPC-A-600F, and the spec. refers to IPC-TM-650 test method in the back of the book. Look on page Number 2.4.22 of the test methods appendix. This outlines the procedure for determining the percentage of bow and twist,
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 07 20:16:23 EDT 2005 | davef
Q1) Simple way to measure the PCB warpage A1) IPC-TM-650; Method 2.4.22 Bow & Twist Q2) What is the maximum warpage can the SMT machine allow the to accept and place the component without problem. A2) That depends. IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Elect
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 09 07:53:16 EDT 2012 | davef
Allowable bow & twist: Together, both IPC-A-600G and IPC-6012B represent the core IPC documents for describing the acceptable and nonconforming conditions that are either externally or internally visible on finished printed boards. IPC-A-600G relies
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 27 12:27:10 EST 2003 | stevel
Hi all, We got some bare pwb in our incoming inspecion looked really wrapped. The maximum twist of the pwb we messured is 0.056inch by following the method in IPC-TM-650 2.4.22 C. (The diagonal size of our pwb is 7.5inch) According to the IPC standa
Electronics Forum | Sun Apr 10 06:27:50 EDT 2005 | WarpSpeed
1.) First of all: What is Your customers requirements??? 2.) If the customer or You don't have a specification; I will strongly recommend that you follow the "IPC-IPC-TM-650 Method 2.4.22 Bow & Twist" that [DaveF] suggested. 3.) If You have "critic
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 20 19:49:03 EST 2006 | davef
Sorry for stating this incorrectly. It should been: Bow & twist for bare boards and panels: IPC-A-610 Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies, 10.6: 1.5% for PTH only and 0.75% for SMT, acording to test method TM-650, method 2.4.22 IPC-6012, par. 3.
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 20 07:12:22 EDT 2001 | wbu
Dougie, oh yes, it�s a bit short that chapter. I have the Revision e in front of me and this one contains in the appendix the needed IPC-TM-650 Test method for bow and twist. Can�t think that they don�t have that in the new revision. Hope you find
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100
