Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 27 08:38:03 EDT 2006 | cuculi54986@yahoo.com
I tried some SN100C from AIM... On only one array. It flowed well on the chips but did not like the finish on the SOT23's on the board. I did not have enough arrays to mess around, so we switched it over to SAC305 and had no issues. I'm guessing w
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 10:48:34 EST 2007 | ck_the_flip
Is there anybody out there doing this scenario: SAC 305 Reflow & SN100C Wave and Selective Can the 2 alloys be mixed on 1 board, say, SAC 305 for SMT, and SN100C for thru-hole? Are 2 different rework chemistries needed, or can one use SN100c wire
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 06 17:42:59 EDT 2006 | GS
found this interesting comparison (SAC305 SN100C) http://www.nihonsuperior.co.jp/english/data/pdf/nse2_1.pdf Regards..........GS
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 15 14:10:59 EST 2007 | Cmiller
Russ is correct. We have been using SAC 305 for SMT and SN100C for wave and selective and repair for about a year. May switch to SN100C in SMT at some point if we can get some paste that wets better.
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 03 13:44:36 EST 2006 | Jon Provost
We switched to Sn100C on 2 waves and kept one with SAC305. The SAC305 will be converted to SN100C as soon as the Aim rep. delivers it next week.
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 01 10:30:33 EDT 2008 | stepheniii
Be sure to peel the potatoes. I saw a guy use a potato to purify gold on the TV show Rough Science. Seriously though I would think SAC305 to SN100C wouldn't be as bad as eutectic to leadfree.
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 20 16:42:31 EST 2007 | ratsalad
We have been using SAC 305 for reflow and Cobalt 995 (very similar to SN100C, only cheaper) for wave and rework for quite a while now with no issues that I'm aware of.
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 29 21:32:52 EDT 2008 | bobsavenger
I was wondering if someone could tell me the steps they went through to convert a SAC305 Wave Solder pot over to SN100C. I'm having wave solder problems with SAC305 and I'm considering a change to SN100C. Didn't know if it was a -in replacement or
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 04 03:30:56 EST 2009 | smartasp
Hi All We intend to switch fro SAC305 to SN100C, which has been giving us great test results. Unfortunately we have a technical guy at head quarter, which refuses to accept the SN100C as it has a 10 deg C higher melting point as SAC. I argue besides
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 29 17:04:43 EST 2009 | jeffjarmato
I run two different waves here one with SAC305 with aqueous flux the other with SN100C and No clean flux. Does anyone see any issues with running product through either machine of course after changing the Flux type? I also only use SAC305 alloy for
.gif)
