Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 25 07:44:39 EDT 2006 | Holly
MikeL, I came across your post. We are also a small company looking at rework systems for BGA/QFN/CSP. .5mm worse case pitch. We had a PACE 1700 on trial and we found it clunky and unreliable. We also evaluated a PDR 410 system and found it better
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 22 03:02:02 EDT 2012 | kcngoi
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about > 2-3years. > > Pros: > > - price, - less dross > comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better > mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 > (depends who pay for "independent" > studies) > > Cons:
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 27 09:43:42 EST 2012 | andrzej
We use succesfully SN100C on ERSA330 for about 2-3years. Pros: - price, - less dross comparing to SAC305, - some ppl say better mechanical durability comparing to SAC305 (depends who pay for "independent" studies) Cons: - higher melting temp so r
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 25 05:56:32 EDT 2019 | pdrirrework
Hello, Have you had a look into our Focused IR Rework systems? A popular alternative to the convectional Rework systems. Our IR-E3M (Micro) would be perfect for your applciation and on one machine you will have the capability of Reworking BGAs up to
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 02 06:03:16 EDT 2006 | jammy
Presently I am looking to buy either a PDR X410 or ERSA IR550A rework mahine.The PDR model is the favourite at the moment however I would not turn down the ERSA model or any other similarly specified infrared based rework system.Unfortunately I have
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 01 13:40:38 EDT 2019 | lapskrfc
Hi all, I'm thinking of adding a high-end rework station to my lab. Budget-wise I can basically afford all the solutions from Finetech, Pace, Ersa, and others. However, I'm not sure which one to go with. I'm considering Finetech Core-plus and Pace
