180 ipc and a and 610 results

Electronics Forum: ipc and a and 610 (Page 2 of 18)

Wave Cassettes and Heat convection

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 16 07:07:17 EST 2007 | tk380514

Answers: The component does take solder, no problem We get a full barrel fill with an empty PCB but only on one of the holes, the other hole has so much copper around it. The flux reached the top of the PCB when I tested the empty PCB. The IPC-A-610

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 18:40:48 EDT 2013 | rway

I also agree. Even if it did meet specs, I wouldn't let a joint like this out. Reese

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 18:10:54 EDT 2013 | davef

I agree with Rob. These solder connections are unacceptable. BR, davef

Material Ageing and Storage

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 22 10:32:25 EST 2001 | CAL

SCOTT- We do solderability testing for the electronics industry using a Multicore and Kester Wetting Balance testers. The standards we test to is IPC J-STD 002 for components and J-STD 003 for PCBs. There is also a system called SERA we co-developed

SMT Processing and gasketing

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 11 17:35:08 EST 2008 | davef

SM-840, is a material qualification document only, with all the test requirements applicable only to a defined test coupon, not to production boards. So, it's useless for what you're trying to accomplish. As assemblers use A-610 - Acceptability Of E

"Gap" in completed solder joint between lead and pad

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 09:37:39 EST 2006 | GS

Have you seen IPC-A-610 D ? regards GS

IPC Standard for Acceptable and Reject Criteria

Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:42:31 EST 2004 | dramos1

Hi Simon, Thanks for the immediate reply. We really appreciate it very much. Currently, we are using Class 2 for the visual inspection criteria of our telecom boards. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C criteria, there are TARGET, ACCEPTABLE and REJECT criterias.

Touch-up and inspection of visual defects

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 25 11:24:31 EDT 2005 | Daan Terstegge

I have a question about inspection, touch-up, and how far you need to go to get a product that meets the required IPC-spec. According to some reports (i.e. "New Study Reveals Component Defect Levels" by Stig Oresjo of Agilent) the average defect leve

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 13:24:14 EDT 2013 | rgduval

We agree that it looks like a touch-up process. However, we're not certain that it would meet Class 3 requirements. It appears to be an incomplete solder joint. The outer bit of solder shows voiding to the inside bit of the solder joint, and it lo

IPC Standard for Acceptable and Reject Criteria

Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 14:46:29 EST 2004 | dramos1

Hi Russ, Thanks for the reply. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C on section 5.2.9 {Mounting - Connectors] page 5-21 on the manual [January 2000], the acceptable class [1,2,3]listed 3 items. In order for the connector to be accepted, are all 3 items must be met? I