.gif)
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 14 13:39:37 EST 2000 | Mark S
Hi All -- I'm about to design a DPAK part (case 369A-13, Issue Z)onto a PCB . The part's maximum length as given in the datasheets (On-Semi MAC4DHM) is 0.030" longer than the recommended land pattern as given in that same datasheet. (1) Has anybod
Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 06 02:24:35 EDT 2008 | gang
thank you very much
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 18 01:47:18 EDT 2017 | bukas
I would go with wire thickness + 0.4 to 0.8 mm for pad width, and pre-tinned lenght + 0.5mm what seems to me like problem is that it can easily roll off the pads in reflow oven
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 14 23:49:37 EST 2000 | DL
Our land patterns are slightly bigger than the part, we've had no problems. There are your own concerns about the part hanging over the pads, this can be ok or not depending on your application and/or how much part is over. I'm sure this is in the J-
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 31 11:01:02 EST 2001 | dougie
Hi Dave, Thanks for the suggestions. To clarify a couple of the points... - What do you qualify as "small" & "large" parts? - Do not make the pad narrower than the lead width. The nominal or the maximum? If I use the maximum width I'll be back to s
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 01 17:32:13 EST 2001 | davef
"small" versus "LARGE" parts? Jeez, what do I know? We don�t have a formal definition. They�re the ones that make you say: �Now, that�s a BIG-ass part!!!� �nominal� versus �maximum�? Yes, yer correct.
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 01 13:08:33 EST 2001 | dave231
I am just starting to get into sub 50mil pitch, but from what I can see you are correct. But I can help with solder stencil. I cut the width only half of what the pad is, but the keep the length the same. This has helped but does not fix always. Stil
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 30 19:42:44 EST 2001 | davef
Jim Blankenhorn [www.smtplus.com] has the best understanding of designing pads for real life. That�s because he designs them like he wants to design them and doesn�t negotiate with a committee of thousands for an IPC standard. Consider doing this
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 30 08:48:01 EST 2001 | dougie
Hi, Our PCB designers are beginning to send up designs to manufacturing that have increasingly difficult footprints to work with. The footprints have been generated by the IPC-SM-782 calculator but just look wrong to me. The pitch of the devices in
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 03 14:08:10 EDT 2002 | gbriceno
I' designing a PCB with SMD components to optimize the land patterns for wave soldering. I find that the IPC-SM-782 land patterns are not robust enough for wave soldering, yielding ramdom skips and bridges. This PCB will also give me insight on sha
PCB Libraries' "Footprint Expert" suite uses CAD LEAP(tm) Technology to greatly simplify footprint and 3D STEP model creation; it is used by tens of thousands of PCB designers and engineers all over the world.
Other / Media / Publisher / Online Resource / Consultant / Service Provider
24654 N. Lake Pleasant Pkwy
Peoria, AZ USA
Phone: 847-557-2300
