Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 29 17:04:43 EST 2009 | jeffjarmato
I run two different waves here one with SAC305 with aqueous flux the other with SN100C and No clean flux. Does anyone see any issues with running product through either machine of course after changing the Flux type? I also only use SAC305 alloy for
Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 22 11:37:00 EST 2020 | kylehunter
Hey all, I've made a post in the past about us expanding to a new space, but I wanted to do a new post with specific questions. We currently have a DEK 265, Phillips Opal Xii, and a Heller 1500. Our main reason for expanding is to have a lead-free
Electronics Forum | Thu May 24 09:11:12 EDT 2001 | Grant Petty
Hi, I would agree. We purchased a TP9 just the slow machine, but we were a small company at the time, and it worked fantastic. Almost no maintenance, and it's a dream to changeover. The serivce in Australia is also very good, but that does not appl
Electronics Forum | Sat Nov 03 11:08:24 EDT 2012 | anvil1021
We have experience with this alloy, but with enig and we did start with PB HASL, none of our PCBs would of course pass thermal cycling at normal temperatures with the HASL so we went to ENIG. we could thermal cycle at 100-115C with no issues. We foun
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 15 09:29:29 EST 2012 | anvil1021
Maybe this piece of information will help. In China (just returned from visit) there are many factories that are using a dual temperature process using SAC305 or Sn100C and 42/58. Apparently this allows them to run their through hole parts through re
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 26 11:31:34 EDT 2010 | rway
I have been using ICT for a number of years. It is still a viable resource for catching defects in the production process. AOI doesn't catch everything, such as bridging on QFN or J-lead devices (this will depend on the type of AOI and camera syste
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 23 13:09:48 EDT 1999 | Steve
| There is a practise within the industry of an Inspector inspecting a board, and that same Inspector performing touch-up. My opinion is that the Inspection and Touch-up operations should be separate functions whereby the Inspector is not performing
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 24 00:04:55 EDT 1999 | Scott McKee
| | | There is a practise within the industry of an Inspector inspecting a board, and that same Inspector performing touch-up. My opinion is that the Inspection and Touch-up operations should be separate functions whereby the Inspector is not perform
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 12 16:14:47 EST 2001 | davef
Yes!!! How can we assemble boards with 20 pitch when we allow 0.008� error to the master art? Excellent question!!! IPC-D-300G has nothing to do with assembler requirements. It is written by and for fabricators, so that they can be comfortable.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 13 12:33:27 EST 2003 | Steve Freeman
We are currently looking for a local source to perform in house, hands on training for PTH hand soldering and rework. The instruction must be hands on and cover from the basics of soldering through performing rework. We have investigated training thr
Blackfox is the industry leader in providing IPC Certifications, Solder Training, Customized Training Programs, and Counterfeit Component Training and Certification.
Training Provider / Standards Setting / Certification / Manufacturer / Consultant / Service Provider
701 Delaware Ave. Unit B
Longmont, CO USA
Phone: 303-684-0135
