Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 10 09:11:51 EST 2014 | rgduval
The centering jaws are made out of copper, I believe...and conductive. I'd suggest that the conductivity of the copper makes it a fairly poor source of ESD damage in a component. I have observed physical damage to components from the centering jaws
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 15:37:22 EST 2020 | stephendo
The best I have seen was two people set up and verify and then two other people not involved with that setup verify. It worked quite well but even then a wrong part was put on. Day shift set up and Afternoon shift thought that both verifications had
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 29 03:11:18 EST 2020 | tamasmagyar
Barcode/scanner configuration can still lead to wrong parts mostly when changing reels. The root cause is still the line operator, because instead of scanning the newly set-up reel, he/she scans the old reel because 'it's easier' for them. I have wor
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 16:47:31 EST 2020 | jede
We are running a Juki SMT line (3RAL and 2080E). I am not sure there is an option for a component verifier. My thought is a barcode/scanner set up and I am in the process of working on this but waiting on Juki response on a file question. We do use
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 20 23:56:47 EDT 2020 | SMTA-Samy
After I create the pick & place program on the pick and place machine (Assembléon, recently aquired by kulicke and soffa), we generate setup sheets for the operator which lists what component goes into what feeder. Upon loading a tape & reel in the f
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 15:25:07 EST 2020 | emeto
If you refer to having wrong resistor or capacitor value, the only way is to automatically measure the part value. Mycronic pick and Place machines do it on the fly, ASM machines have feeder where part is measured....other main brands probably have
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 12:32:44 EST 2020 | jede
We have had a few large human error, wrong placement in the SMT set up over the past year(same package size placed in the wrong feeder position to where it goes unnoticed) and we are trying to look for possible process improvements to prevent this fr
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 28 16:34:34 EST 2020 | spoiltforchoice
I genuinely think component verifier on the machine is the optimum solution. Even then it can probably get caught out, we build some instrumentation that can have 10K 1%, 10K 0.1% and 10k 0.1% 2ppm, a verifier won't catch those getting mixed up,likew
Electronics Forum | Sat Mar 30 05:51:34 EST 2002 | bayanbaru
We are using barcodes but we still end up with wrong parts. Apparently some operators fail to scan the reel. We are pretty strict on this, we even issue 'warning letter' to operator for failing to scan. We see some reduction in wrong parts but not to
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 29 04:23:55 EST 2002 | bayanbaru
What are the control process that can be introduce to avoid placing wrong part. We are using machine like Siemens 80S & 80F, Sanyo TCM 3000 and GSM. I am from the Quality System dept.
