Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 29 10:39:48 EDT 1999 | JohnJ
Bill, Thanks for the input. I took a brief look at the Brady machine on their website. I think their latest is the PAM 6000. It didn't appear it could keep up. My most difficult application is to put 42 labels on a 21-up board in under 1 min 20 sec.
Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 10 20:30:58 EDT 2005 | fastek
Doesn't PFA have available a calibration board kit similar to Fuji PAM? If they don't, they should.
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 16 14:48:36 EDT 2005 | fuji pam
If you would like to email me at sms8740@juno.com I have all the info you will need.
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 03 07:32:56 EDT 2006 | cyber_wolf
I agree. If you put them back in the same place you should be fine. The way you measure/calibrate placing accuracy is by running PAM. This program determines any error in the shafts.
Electronics Forum | Sun Jan 29 11:54:06 EST 2006 | johnw
Hi Dax you want to run a cal card with good cad data on all machines then take the results and then alter the placement xy data to pull all machines into calibration. But make sure all the cameras are calibrated and the pam results are good and withi
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 21 10:13:19 EDT 1999 | Bill Bannister
The Brady PAM 5000 may work for you as well. I think they have a web site. This machine is smema compatible. It's automatically places barcode labels onto pcb's within an 18"x22" area with .020" accuracy. The labels can be placed at 0 or 90 deg onto
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 04 10:50:25 EST 2003 | ggspook
Hi Mike Interested on your thoughts about (Pam) Placement Accuracy Measurement I am looking into establishing Accurate repeatability of my equipment we check our calibrations Regular and the calibrations are in spec but this does not guarantee
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 19 16:15:47 EST 2006 | johnw
we have fuji's cp-iv-3 machine made in 1993.we > are facing problem everytime when we change the > jobs(for example we change from pcbA to pcbB to > pcbA)even though program is same. There are some > mechanical adjustments like conveyor adjusted
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 04 12:05:27 EST 2003 | ggspook
Thanks Mike Honestly the whole subject of repeatability is Is confusing i.e. I do perform placement tests using glass plate�s Fuji IP3 and Pam on the Fuji chip shooters which calibrate to 3 sigma but I cannot guarantee placement repeatability As y
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 10 14:13:36 EST 2003 | msivigny
Hello Bill, As I mentioned in an earlier thread, I was not familiar with the PAM system but have since been given a quick run down on how it performs its measurement routine. It is an acceptable way to measure and optimze Fuji chip shooter performanc
