Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 12:36:39 EDT 2003 | charlie
Equally important is the bottomside support tooling. This may also play into your printer decision.
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 12:39:21 EDT 2003 | charlie
So important that I was compelled to say it twice.
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 16 09:55:06 EST 2007 | ck_the_flip
Amen to that! You wanna be a window washer, then use squeegees!
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 09 21:18:59 EST 2021 | smtusa
Thanks, we have an 03i. Whats the difference between 02i and 03i?
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 15 16:25:52 EDT 2018 | ceharperc1
Anyone with a lot of printing experience, especially in proflow process? I am seeing a lot of voids in the bottom of the head after running. Will run with multiple good assemblies with paste volume being between 60% and 150%, out of no where we wil
Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 07 12:02:30 EDT 1999 | Brad Kendall
| Dear sirs, | | If you have experienced Proflow of DEK screen printer, please let me know the details of it. | | Best regards, | | Jame Bond | | I have had Proflow for about 8 weeks now. I have had my fair share of problems with it. It does
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 14 02:48:55 EST 2003 | erhard
Can anyone give me informations how tell the different ProFlow systems from each other? There are casetty systems, refillable systems, refillable systems with temperature control, casette systems with software controlled pressure regulation and refil
Electronics Forum | Mon Mar 31 11:14:59 EST 2003 | pr
We found that the Pro-flow cartridges had paste in them we couldn't get out, that seemed more wasteful than the Rheo-pump. We ran both and I agree with the previous posting, that comfort level with the machine 2D, software etc. were more important. W
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 14 18:12:44 EST 2000 | Brian Book
I believe that the Rheopump is the better design. The proflow uses a square chamber that doesn't allow the paste to roll. The control is far better also, and the design allows the use of standard piles cartridges.
