Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 29 14:42:55 EDT 2004 | davef
You're correct, for every dumpster full of paper written about solder, there's a sentance written about fluxes. There's dribs and drabs about fluxes in most of the soldering books [ie, Manko, Klein-Wassink, Judd, Strauss, etc] and most of that is ve
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 11 16:30:08 EST 2008 | naynayno
Occasionally solder mask thickness is believed to be the cause of gasketing challenges during paste printing. We currently specific IPC-SM-840 on our fab drawings but this provides no limits or guidelines on thickness. I do not want to cause an unr
Electronics Forum | Wed May 20 17:56:51 EDT 2009 | dyoungquist
I have attached a pdf showing the dimensions for the QFN we placed. First, The pins on the part are not only on the bottom side but also wrap around to come up each of the 4 sides of the part as shown in the side view in the attached pdf. This i
Electronics Forum | Thu Oct 18 11:08:22 EDT 2012 | scottp
Since we follow IPC Class III, I've done experiments turning N2 on and off and measuring void level with both SnPb and SAC305 solder. In both cases there was a statistically significant, measurable increase in voids with N2, but it wasn't significan
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 10 10:31:47 EDT 2020 | proceng1
Certain customers do give us CAD. USUALLY ODB++ but I've also gotten .ipc and .pcb . Many of our customers bought or inherited a design, and therefore have no control to generate additional files. Or, as you mentioned, they had another manufacture
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 22 10:32:25 EST 2001 | CAL
SCOTT- We do solderability testing for the electronics industry using a Multicore and Kester Wetting Balance testers. The standards we test to is IPC J-STD 002 for components and J-STD 003 for PCBs. There is also a system called SERA we co-developed
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 11 17:35:08 EST 2008 | davef
SM-840, is a material qualification document only, with all the test requirements applicable only to a defined test coupon, not to production boards. So, it's useless for what you're trying to accomplish. As assemblers use A-610 - Acceptability Of E
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 07:18:51 EDT 2017 | jamesbarnhart
IPC has updated assembly standards for IPC A-610 and IPC JSTD-001 making them easier to use and adding information in areas that have evolved. Both IPC J-STD-001E and IPC-A-610E have also been more closely linked to eliminating the differences that c
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 09:15:32 EDT 2017 | davef
James: This is not "breaking news." IPC-A-610F, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies was released in July 2014. Both, ... * IPC-A-610G, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies * J-STD-001G, Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assem
Electronics Forum | Sat Jun 12 16:24:02 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| Is there public domain information available on standard surface mount package outlines and footprints? | Thanks, | WillyW | Willy, The IPC has a great listing for the std packages and footprints, as do most component manufacturers. I'd start on
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100