Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 22 16:40:23 EST 2007 | mika
One of our customers that always was going for Ni/Au surface finish on RoHS PCB and our processs was adjusted for that, "whithout any problem". Recently they decided to switch to another surface finsh: PbFree HASL. What is that? Imersion tin/silver?
Electronics Forum | Fri Nov 16 08:33:46 EST 2007 | rgduval
For RoHS assemblies, we're spec'ing at least FR-406 for the higher Tg. We're currently requesting our customers to use ENIG finish, as we've had better luck with assembly in our process; but we're currently experimenting wtih lead-free HASL. As far
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 06 16:31:41 EST 2015 | jacklucas
In switching to lead free processing, we find ourselves having over 400 PCB part numbers with Sn63 HASL finish. And there is no hope of quickly purging inventory and getting our drawings changed to call out a lead free finish. I want to avoid having
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 08 22:32:18 EDT 2005 | adlsmt
If you are using fine lines and tight spacing ENIG may be cheaper than HASL. This is because there is not as much bridging at the board house between traces so they do less touch up. This would probably be even more true with no-lead. We have been us
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 14 13:12:30 EDT 2005 | Mika
Thanks Patrick, I our mixed standard HASL/RoHS production area; our customer have choosen Ni/Au plating for their RoHS boards. What You are saying (3.); is that we should be more attentive on the quality of the pcb manufactory. Even if our customer