Electronics Forum | Tue May 16 15:33:56 EDT 2006 | Chunks
Hi Russ, Are you talking about Figure 3-8? I always took 782 as a "guideline" for recommended layouts versus poor layouts. 610 page 12-87 "anomalies" kinda shows what's being dicussed.
Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 06 11:11:04 EST 2015 | mascott123
I have asked that same question to a co-chair of the J-STD-001 committee who in turn checked with personnel at IPC. The answer I received is that yes you can apply the Class 3 assembly requirements using a class 2 PWB but the resultant assembly will
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 27 14:13:34 EDT 2007 | realchunks
Hi piotr You have a pretty good start. Continue with IPC-SM-782 and IPC-A-610.
Electronics Forum | Wed May 12 02:22:03 EDT 1999 | Richard Durrant
| Need a footpint for a 10 lead uSOIC (RM-10) | Have you tried the IPC website at www.ipc.com, they have an online land pattern calculator that not only gives you there RLP (Regisistered Land Patterns) for standard components, but also allows you to
Electronics Forum | Tue May 16 14:17:34 EDT 2006 | russ
If the terms are connected electrically it does meet IPC bridging between "non common conductors" is the defect you should be fine, FYI, the .010" spacing is a violation of IPC 782 Russ
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 08 14:28:18 EDT 2022 | davef
While IPC-A-610 [ https://www.ipc.org/TOC/IPC-A-610G.pdf ] is a good starting point for establishing your inspection requirements, there is no requirement for using a specific tool to make a measurement. You need to choose the microscope, AOI, loop,
Electronics Forum | Wed May 09 11:05:26 EDT 2001 | davef
IPC-7525 "Stencil Design Guidelines" �9 END OF LIFE, states "Stencils should be inspected periodically for damage that would conribute to decreased printing performance. Refer to Section 7 for inspection guidelines." Or words to that effect. Now b
Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 03 12:27:41 EST 2004 | mruzicka
I did a quick search and ran across this: www.nepcon.co.uk/files/pt_kbryant.pdf You can also look here http://listserv.ipc.org/scripts/wa.exe?A1=ind0411&L=technet post #32.
Electronics Forum | Tue May 16 18:01:50 EDT 2006 | russ
Steve just mentioned the 782 for ammo to customer, we usually get "it doesn't meet IPC" so we then say it was not designed to. let the pissin contest begin! Russ
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 12 20:20:54 EST 2000 | Bene
I had the opportunity to spend time with a demo and one on one with the inventor of the Ersa scope inhouse a few months ago. I see the scope complimenting X-ray inspection but not as a substitue. It allows you to view attributes of a solder joint t
EPTAC is an internationally recognized solder training and IPC certification corporation, giving professionals the skills to accelerate their careers, and businesses the talent to succeed.
Training Provider / Standards Setting / Certification
Longfellow Square, Bldg. II
Manchester, NH USA
Phone: 603-296-0887