Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 17 03:43:26 EST 2004 | vinitverma
Hi Fastek (what's your name?) The problem here is about the misconception about the FCM-I. As you rightly mentioned, the FCMs have gone through evolution in the last 10 years and the FCM 'I' too went through a lot of changes! And the FCM Is delivere
Electronics Forum | Fri May 24 17:28:04 EDT 2002 | fastek
Good points regarding Sanyo. I believe they were the first to introduce the "Direct Drive" concept. It's quite impressive. Panasonic probably ripped them off when designed their MSR's. It's interesting to note that an FCM-2 placing 96,000 comp. per h
Electronics Forum | Fri May 31 16:16:42 EDT 2002 | Ozzy
Does Fuji even make the QP-132 anymore? I have not seen it at Apex for the past 2-3 years. This "inflexible" dinosaur was a commercial disaster for Fuji. Philips/Assembleon has sold countless more FCM than Fuji QP-132. The problem with both machines
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 15 15:34:07 EDT 2002 | Bob
Hi, I have loads of experience with QP132's. You can change over product quite easily depending on a few things: - � The board sizes should be the same otherwise pallet adjustment can take an hour or so. � If you can fit all the feeders on one set-u
Electronics Forum | Fri May 24 11:46:34 EDT 2002 | tmv
Lot's of good discussion in this string...but I think we've missed a few points. First off...turret machines are more than capable of handling the smaller component sizes (in fact, they are the best)...Machines like the SANYO TCM-3000 or Universal 47
