Electronics Forum: retardant (Page 4 of 5)

What is needed for UL ?

Electronics Forum | Tue Sep 12 12:43:26 EDT 2017 | deanm

50) traces. The design will be tested for safety and a file will be created listing all the critical components such as transformers, relays, wiring, enclosure material, etc. On the manufacturing side, a manufacturing facility must be indicated in

Re: Ionic testing and No-Clean flux

Electronics Forum | Sat Feb 05 09:08:18 EST 2000 | Dave F

Casimir: Let me expand on something that I said in my response to your thread on ionic testing. Generally, no-clean people don�t use ROSE testing as part of their process control, because the ROSE test is essentially washing your board in DI/IPA �

Re: Board contamination

Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 14 11:00:38 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Mario: Your ask a very broad question and give no background information. Generally, the amount and type of residues present on a printed circuit board at the very beginning of a SMT line depends on the exposure of the board up to that point. For

UP1500 Frame Sizes?

Electronics Forum | Tue May 03 21:46:13 EDT 2005 | KEN

I have 5 of these machines. What software version are you running. 24 inch frames will interfere with the USC. The solvent bar will ride on the stencil frame. This will not allow for a pre-load on the foil. 1. Adaptors suck! 2. Adaptors suck! 3

Nitrogen in the Reflow Oven

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 14 19:59:17 EDT 2013 | hegemon

We do in fact see a reduction in soldering defects, most especially wetting issues for both parts and PWBs, tombstones, billboards, etc... As a CM we see all kinds of customer furnished material, some of it not in the greatest condition. Our best p

Contamination test

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 30 21:03:44 EDT 2001 | davef

You should specify the level of res based on the effect of the res on the end-use of the product. J-STD-001 defines cleanliness requirements for ALL flux types, including water soluble and no-clean that you mention. 1 There is no equivalency betwee

Re: Why not use lead-free plumbing solders in electrical applications?

Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 30 09:32:42 EDT 1999 | Steve Gregory

| | |Hi all | | This Debate on lead free soldering is really hotting up here in Europe. From 2004 the use of lead in components and assemblies will be banned here. Also flame retardent halogens will be banned(FR4 etc). While we all agree that we hav

Saponifier needed to stop

Electronics Forum | Sat Oct 06 08:32:09 EDT 2001 | davef

Mr. Wizard is not currently available. You get the wizzer. Maybe your dream date will show later. Get your own lab tests done. Show your potential customer that your boards are clean. That�s the issue. The issue is not how you go about cleaning

Re: Hey Ya'll, let's talk about Lead fer' a bit...

Electronics Forum | Wed May 05 03:57:00 EDT 1999 | Bernard Mulcahy

| Hi Ya' John! | | Here's my comeback to the points you've raised...you knew I would have a comeback, didn't ya'? | | |Steve, | | | | I see your point, and yes there are alot bigger fish to fry in |the removal or control of lead in the environment

Re: Wetting Balance Equipment

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 17 02:57:47 EDT 1998 | Bob Willis

| | Looking for Suppliers of surface mount wetting balance equipment. | Bucky: Section 6 of the ANSI/J-STD-002 specification lists wetting balance suppliers. Dave F I like and continue to use the Multicore system. I have had many ours using the sys

Previous 1 2 3 4 5  

retardant searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information