Electronics Forum: nickel alloy (Page 6 of 10)

SN100C Nickel Content

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 03 04:51:58 EDT 2009 | lococost

From alpha metals lead free alloy impurities bulletin: "Levels greater than 0.025% may start to slow the wetting speed and could affect the hole fill performance. If process performance is OK then levels up to 0.05% are OK."

SN100C Nickel Content

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 03 12:04:39 EDT 2009 | davef

Loco: Your post seems to be pasted from a Alpha Metals SACX0807 application sheet. We don't understand the relationship between your SACX0807 and Hoss67 SN100C. They're different alloys.

SN100C Nickel Content

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 06 05:57:10 EDT 2009 | lococost

Indeed Dave, But I can't image the extra .5% silver that alpha adds to sn100c will make a huge impact on the difference between the behaviour of the 2 alloys, especially considering SAC gets exactly the same recommendation.

Lead-Free Wave Defects

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 08 03:44:28 EST 2006 | fctassembly

Hello Amol, I continue to be amazed at the surprise engineers have on discovering that a non-eutectic alloy such as SAC305 displays micro-cracking and rough joints in a soldering process. There was a reason the electronics industry chose to use eutec

Lead free tin copper only

Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 05 08:41:15 EST 2006 | Cmiller

Are you refering to reflow soldering or wave soldering? Brian, do you have any data to support that SAC305 is more reliable than Tin-Copper-Nickel? NEMI reccomended SAC type alloys for reflow and Tin-Copper for wave. See: http://circuitsassembly.

Soldering to Inconel 600 Alloy

Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 20 21:01:12 EST 2004 | davef

Bare inconel is NOT ment to take solder, because * Nickel develops a tenacious oxide layer that is very difficult to remove since the nature of the oxide is very dense, coherent, etc. * Chromium is difficult to solder. * Iron is difficult to solder.

Need SN100C Reliability & Process comments!

Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 13:29:45 EST 2006 | solderiron

SN100C, not as aggressive towards other metals as are other High tin lead free alloys. Why? Sn63/pb37 The lead prevented the tin from being very aggressive. SAC305 no lead, silver instead. Silver doesnt block Tin from it's aggresiveness. SN100C no si

BGA Pull test

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 25 21:49:14 EDT 2004 | davef

First, any results of pull or shear tests are unscientific at best. [We pop our BGA from boards with, appropriately enough, a beverage can opener.] Second, we have no have problems with your ENIG specification. Third, as with your customer, we'd e

Cu dissolution PTH

Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 05 11:00:37 EDT 2005 | patrickbruneel

Inds, This will happen with all lead-free alloys having a tin content above 70%. It takes about 30 sec. for a molten lead-free alloy to totally dissolve a copper pad. The higher the temperature the shorter the time and visa versa. The scary part of

Mixing lead free chemistry

Electronics Forum | Sat May 28 06:43:03 EDT 2005 | steve

I have the ability to offer both SAC and SN100C lead free alloys to my customer base. What might occur if a customer is already using SAC305 in their wave and they want to save money and go to SN100C. They now are mixing, tin,silver,copper with tin,c


nickel alloy searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information