Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 23 03:13:47 EST 2004 | Steve Stach
The "Rose" test is a process control tool because it is cheap and easy to use. It has it's problems; but, it is generally agreed to be the best tool available for this purpose. All others are much more expensive and time consuming to run every day.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 31 13:38:17 EST 2005 | mrclean
This build up is likely related to the defoamer. Defoamers are typically based on waxes and/or high molecular weight Hydrocarbons. As defoamers only need to work on the exposed fluid surface, not a lot of defoamer is needed (unless you are using
Electronics Forum | Fri May 27 17:21:35 EDT 2005 | mrclean
Dear SM Rookies, Another acceptable test method is visual inspection. IPC-A-610 details what to look for with different contaminants, providing magnified pictures of the possible visual residues. With an existing cleaning process, magnification
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 30 15:05:23 EDT 2005 | Shean Dalton
Dear Ing, Have you analyzed why some RF device aren't operational after washing? An assumption is that failures are related to the ultrasonic energy applied. Other possibilities are for poor rinsing, poor drying, inadequate washing on those failed
Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 10 14:04:38 EST 2006 | Mike Konrad
Flashback time� Vapor degreasers, although still used in limited applications, no longer represent the conventional wisdom (due to multiple environmental issues). Aqueous-based technologies are the most common method of defluxing. Unlike most va
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 04 11:43:06 EDT 2006 | Mike Konrad
Here's a "flameless" reply... I�ll allow others to recommend� Here is a list of the �usual suspects�: Aqueous Technologies Batch and inline de-fluxers Ultrasonic stencil cleaning systems De-fluxing and stencil cleaning chemicals www.aqueoustech.co
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 25 19:27:11 EDT 2008 | Mike Konrad
There are a number of �low cost� stencil cleaners available. I am a manufacturer of one but I'll list a variety and let the others provide editorial on which is best. Basically, there are three technologies, manual cleaning (solvents and wipes), ul
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 09 15:40:58 EST 2014 | davef
Batch cleaner Aqueous Technologies, 9055 Rancho Park Ct, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730; 909-944-7771 F909-944-7775 aqueoustech.com Austin American Technology; 12201 Technology Blvd, Austin, TX 78727; 512-35-6400 F512-335-5753 aat-corp.com EMC Global Tec
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 06 12:32:20 EDT 1998 | Roxanne Picou
March 31, 1998-Austin, TX --- Austin American Technology announces a new Pre-Wash feature for the Mega� II to operate in conjunction with AAT's patented closed-loop regenerative cleaning process. This feature allows for an optional dual chemistry
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 07 14:09:57 EDT 2001 | aqueous
Hi Carol, Pressure requirements have changed over the past few years. In the recent past, aqueous cleaning systems relied on high flow, low pressure �flooding� techniques. 20 � 30 PSI pumped through large orifice nozzles. With ever increasing boa
