Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 25 08:45:22 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| I am studing the possibility of a line with one Siemens SIPLACE 80 F and a PANASONIC machine (cam be a MSH-G3 or MVIIF (m) or MSHII (m)). | I have several reasons to do this, but i would like to know more details about operating this kind of line.
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 02 18:27:53 EDT 1998 | Rob Reilly
| Unicam can be a powerful tool, but you want to find out who else may be using it on the same Panasonic machine. I do know of soembody that is using it with Siemens if you are interested. | I am sure you have your reasons, but I am very curious wh
Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 04 12:03:45 EDT 1998 | Bill West
| | | Unicam can be a powerful tool, but you want to find out who else may be using it on the same Panasonic machine. I do know of soembody that is using it with Siemens if you are interested. | | I am sure you have your reasons, but I am very cur
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 25 09:45:39 EDT 2016 | spoiltforchoice
How do you answer that question? You probably won't find anyone who has worked with both which leaves them comparing datasheets just like you presumably already have. http://www.e-by-siplace.com/28657/E-Performance/Overview/e_series_stage.aspx?slide=
Electronics Forum | Sun Jan 06 19:43:48 EST 2008 | andrewlog
I think Panasert MSR is a good machine. You can easily program these machines using text files. Panasonic pubishes the format. The CM88 is harder to program. You will need to use the PT200 machine controller program. Different text formats can be imp
Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 13 09:00:42 EST 2005 | fasst1
Grant, Again, just my .02 worth. I would have to agree with Greg as well. Two Flex machines from the same vendor will give you much better line balancing, and I think better overall capability than adding a different type of 'animal' chip shooter
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 10 04:15:01 EDT 2005 | vinitverma
Ari, I would suggest you make a checklist of all your requirements (not just large scale production) and prioritize them with weights assigned to each. Fill in the checklist for each equipment and manufacturer and you'll have the results out. I wou
Electronics Forum | Fri May 09 10:44:41 EDT 2003 | gregp
"Point of use" could be your common high runner parts. They are sometimes kept next to the machines (at the point of use) and may be categorized seperately from the rest of the inventory. In your case all of your parts are inventoried next to the m
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 04 11:57:33 EDT 1999 | David Lynch
Drawing from my experience with Amistar's PlacePro 7100, here's a bit of additional info and comment on previous postings... - The 6-head PlacePro 7100 is an INCREDIBLE memory machine and is equally capable as a line balancer. As a fine-pitch placer
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 03 13:10:15 EDT 2007 | slthomas
Personally I wouldn't count anything but minutes. You need to know how long it takes to perform each task in order to balance your line. What I'm gathering is that you've got one printer feeding 4 machines, all running different jobs or maybe a pai
