Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 15 15:44:50 EDT 2006 | McGill
Ball SAC is hard to overcome. Try RSS profile
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 15 15:44:51 EDT 2006 | McGill
Ball SAC is hard to overcome. Try RSS profile
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 01 01:27:58 EDT 2021 | sn
Hi Davef, thank you for your information.
Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 01 03:16:39 EDT 2021 | sn
thank you for your information.
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 18 12:11:45 EDT 2008 | jwentz
Does anyone have experience with using Pb-free SAC105? We are looking at the pro's/con's compared to a SAC305 process for a SMT operation. I have read it has a higher melting temperature. Specifically, we are concerned about a product we are developi
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 25 16:30:44 EDT 2008 | aj
Hi, I would be interested to hear the outcome of your trials! Although, if mechanical stress is of concern, I would look at what is causing the stress and tackle that. I would suspect that any stress great enough to fracture sAC305 joint would do t
Electronics Forum | Thu May 25 12:28:56 EDT 2006 | inds
no there is lot of difference between both the alloys.. SN100C works better than SAC305... gives little more time to remove and replace the unit without completely loosing the Cu... but there are customers who still prefer sticking to SAC305... so th
Electronics Forum | Fri May 05 08:23:07 EDT 2006 | molosse21
Hi everyone We plan to use on our smt line sac 305 and on our wave soldering sn100c. Will there be a compatibility problem if we do make touch up with sn100c on smt or touch up thru hole components with sac 305 ??? Thanks for taking time to reply
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 15 10:05:41 EDT 2007 | Johnny
Sorry new to this... Question: will I have any problem soldering a resistor network with SAC305 coated leads using a normal leaded wave process besides the normal board thickness issues Thx
