Electronics Forum: selective vs. wave (Page 7 of 79)

Bottom side SMT wave vs. top side reflow yields

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 18:32:42 EDT 2002 | Dreamsniper

Hi Steve, On my point of view, you already answered your own questions and I agree with your answer. regards, Dreamsniper

Bottom side SMT wave vs. top side reflow yields

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 12:48:26 EDT 2002 | slthomas

Assuming all things are equal (attention to good DFM guidelines, well trained and capable operators, well maintained equipment, etc.), which would you expect to have the higher process yield, standard SMT/through-hole all topside, or all SMT bottom (

Bottom side SMT wave vs. top side reflow yields

Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 30 17:33:20 EDT 2002 | slthomas

Thanks, guys. Hi Larry, long time no "see". Dave, 60k dots out of a Camalot 2800 does not a "Dispenser Boy" make. :P I'd print them in a heartbeat if the proximity to radial leads didn't necessitate me placing radials first. Oh, wait, I'd have to

Bottom side SMT wave vs. top side reflow yields

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 29 20:04:13 EDT 2002 | davef

Steve: I agree. Let�s break it down. * I�d rather print paste than glue any day of the week * But I know yera �Dispenser Boy�. In that case, I�d rather dispense glue than paste. * PTH / primary and SMT / secondary is a tough process either way you

AOI: Agilent vs. Omron vs. MIRTec/YESTech?

Electronics Forum | Sat Dec 09 09:51:14 EST 2006 | pvasquez

Hello Lou, As a high-mix low-to-mid volume manufacturer, you will need to concentrate on equipment that may be progammed very easily, with very quick debug time from assembly to assembly. I have worked with Agilent in the past, and one of my collea

Nitrogen used in selective soldering

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 23 11:27:45 EST 2015 | charliedci

Per our selective solder provider, they recommend a PSA type generator to supply the needed 99.999% pure N2. The membrane type (which we have) does not provide the minimum (99.995%) purity necessary for lead free wave soldering. They happen to sell P

SACX vs. SN100C

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 07:19:33 EDT 2006 | paulinct

I am also getting ready to order solder for my new wave. Based on what I have read (here and other places) people prefer Sn100c for the wave. I have yet to hear of someone using Sn100c and switching to SACx. I am using SAC305 for reflow and I am tryi

SACX vs. SN100C

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 08:49:02 EDT 2006 | russ

Hi Paul, not to throw a wrench in here but I beleive that paople are talking about switching from SAC in wave to SN100C, NOT SACx, these are different. and should not be confused. SACx is supposed to fall somewhere in the middle of the SN100C and t

SACX vs. SN100C

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 19 15:14:57 EDT 2006 | cuculi54986@yahoo.com

We have SnCuCo (Cobalt 995) solder from MRI in our solder pot. I'm not the wave master here, but I believe our wave master is pretty satisfied with it. Send an email to cuculi54986@yahoo.com, and I'll forward your email address from there to him.

Philips vs. Quad

Electronics Forum | Wed Mar 10 16:18:52 EST 1999 | Raymond Morford

I'm in the process of selecting a medium speed pick & place machine. I need to place a wide range of components from 0805 chips to a 144 pin MQFP (32mm square 25mil lead spacing). Anyway, I'm looking at the Quad QSA-30, the Philips Orion (now call


selective vs. wave searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information