Electronics Forum: 062 (Page 8 of 11)

Discoloring of Soldermask and silkscreen

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 12 19:28:26 EDT 1999 | Tom B

Netters, When I reflow a PCB there is a discoloration of silkscreen and mask. It appears if Profile is too hot! But I dont think so, maybe I'm wrong? 1. Kester 293 no clean 2. 2.1 C/s for 30s to 150 C 3. .5 - .7 C/s for 60s to 185 C 4. 1.5 C/s u

Re: Discoloring of Soldermask and silkscreen

Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 13 18:11:00 EDT 1999 | Jimmy Strain

| Netters, | | When I reflow a PCB there is a discoloration of silkscreen and mask. It appears if Profile is too hot! But I dont think so, maybe I'm wrong? | | 1. Kester 293 no clean | 2. 2.1 C/s for 30s to 150 C | 3. .5 - .7 C/s for 60s to 185

Re: Discoloring of Soldermask and silkscreen

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 19 11:21:03 EDT 1999 | Travson

| Netters, | | When I reflow a PCB there is a discoloration of silkscreen and mask. It appears if Profile is too hot! But I dont think so, maybe I'm wrong? | | 1. Kester 293 no clean | 2. 2.1 C/s for 30s to 150 C | 3. .5 - .7 C/s for 60s to 185

Re: Discoloring of Soldermask and silkscreen

Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 19 20:49:13 EDT 1999 | Dave F

| Netters, | | When I reflow a PCB there is a discoloration of silkscreen and mask. It appears if Profile is too hot! But I dont think so, maybe I'm wrong? | | 1. Kester 293 no clean | 2. 2.1 C/s for 30s to 150 C | 3. .5 - .7 C/s for 60s to 185

Re: turbulent wave restrictions

Electronics Forum | Fri May 08 08:12:32 EDT 1998 | Steve Gregory

| I am running a board that is .062" thick and has components that over hang the edge of the board by .090". I have bottom side smt components (chip caps and resistors only) and use the turbulent wave to help solder the components. The problem I am

Re: turbulent wave restrictions

Electronics Forum | Thu May 07 13:22:37 EDT 1998 | Chrys

| I am running a board that is .062" thick and has components that over hang the edge of the board by .090". I have bottom side smt components (chip caps and resistors only) and use the turbulent wave to help solder the components. The problem I am

Re: turbulent wave restrictions

Electronics Forum | Thu May 07 12:54:01 EDT 1998 | DARRYL SCHLOSSER

| I am running a board that is .062" thick and has components that over hang the edge of the board by .090". I have bottom side smt components (chip caps and resistors only) and use the turbulent wave to help solder the components. The problem I am

Re: PCB panellisation

Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 07 15:55:37 EDT 1998 | Michael Allen

| I'm also in the "Don't score it" camp. Routed breakaways are much better. If your wave solder process has decent control on the wave height, you shouldn't worry about flooding the boards. | The fine pitch consideration for panelizing - Since you

Re: PCB panellisation

Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 07 17:33:17 EDT 1998 | Eldon Sanders

I agree with Michael, scoring works great. We build both and medium size small boards, anywhere from 2 to 100 square inches. Thickness from .030 to .062 Panels contain anywhere from 2 to 16 boards. About half are odd shaped, with cutouts and not

Rework and repair system suggestions

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 27 06:39:59 EST 2005 | reash

For now, on this first board, we will be reworking components such as 0805 and 1210 size caps and resistors, along with SOT-23 and SC-70 size packages. We might eventually get into BGAs. This board will most likely be a double-sided board, probably


062 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information