Electronics Forum: assess (Page 8 of 28)

SMT Carrier Pallets

Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 09 19:04:08 EST 2021 | jzeivel

Thank you for your reply! I will see how it goes without the carrier pallets. I was worried about them drooping too far in the center (at the center V-Score) and falling off of the conveyor in the reflow oven. I am putting boarders on all sides of

Re: Startup info

Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 29 17:21:46 EST 1998 | Dave F

| I am looking for a questionaire/list of items that need to be addressed to determine the pros/cons and equipment, manpower, cost and lead time to determine if one should consider setting up an in-house SMT line. | Can anyone help? | thanks | | J

To Rework Or Not? Ah That's The ...

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 20:30:39 EDT 2000 | Dave F

We are trying to improve the decision process for our Material Review Board (MRB. We have a fairly standard defect identification and MRB process. We are pretty comfortable with our ability to: � Identify problems components and assemblies. � Segre

Re: Solder Mask problem

Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 01 21:54:00 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Jeremy: Standards: � A-600 talks about percentage of solder mask loss allowed, according to the location (eg, laminate, bare copper, gold or nickel, melting metals) and equipment class. � A-610 talks to "Solder Resist Coating - Voids & Blisters" by

Rework Or Not To Rework Thant's The ...

Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 20 12:18:02 EDT 2000 | Dave F

Bob: We are trying to improve the decision making process used by our Material Review Board (MRB). We have a fairly standard defect identification and MRB process. In this we: * Identify problems in components and assemblies. * Segregate problems

Process Qualification

Electronics Forum | Mon Jun 18 18:37:53 EDT 2001 | davef

OK. We have a new board with a BGA on it. When have a nice new Glenbrook xray inspection machine. Our troops are trained. Specifically, what are the steps we should use to qualify our BGA soldering process and how should be best use our new Glenb

Re: Ionic testing and No-Clean flux

Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 07 11:05:50 EST 2000 | Graham Naisbitt

Dave You are so right about that point. I still use some cost models we ran up some 5 years ago. I took one to a customer and showed them that they could make $400K more PROFIT PER YEAR running OA v No-Clean. Their response? Well, we don't believe

Re: Intelliplace and Europlacer

Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 30 10:18:31 EST 1998 | Dave F

| We are in the process of assessing some medium volume, stand alone SMT Placement systems. Does anyone have any experience with :- | | 1) Europlacer (Specifically the Progress 6 or EP600) | 2) Intelliplace (DHM-120 or SHM-120) | | I have searched

Re: Intelliplace

Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 30 20:32:07 EST 1998 | Dave F

| We are in the process of assessing some medium volume, stand alone SMT Placement systems. Does anyone have any experience with :- | | 1) Europlacer (Specifically the Progress 6 or EP600) | 2) Intelliplace (DHM-120 or SHM-120) | | I have searched

Re: Reclaim - bent leads (SMT)

Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 16 07:06:10 EDT 1998 | Gerry Gillies

In the past year I have introduced a component reclaim process. There are a number of machines on the market, though it's true that reclaim is still a fairly labour intensive activity. We have had good results with a German machine manufactured by Ro


assess searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information