Electronics Forum: ipc-610... (Page 8 of 17)

Need SMT Operator

Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 19 15:22:51 EDT 2008 | mliljequist

I'm looking for a qualified individual to operate Juki SMT equipment with IPC 610 soldering skills and component ID knowledge. This position is located in Minneapolis, MN. If anyone knows of someone who fits the description please email me and I wo

Soldering Specification Needed

Electronics Forum | Fri Sep 23 16:39:00 EDT 2011 | action_101

The small investemnt of purchasing the IPC-610 manual will pay for itself very quickly. A brief description of the two classes in a few words would be the following: Class II - a well built product with reasonable expectations for both the manufactur

0603 component on 0805 pad & vice-versa

Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 29 06:33:49 EST 2012 | amitsindwani

Please define the defect in following conditions & link to IPC 610 clause/sub-clause no.: 1. 0603 component placed on 0805 PCB pad 2. 0805 component placed on 0603 PCB pad 3. 1206 component placed on 1210 PCB pad and 4. 1210 component placed on 1206

Hi anyone have recommended pcb manufacturer?

Electronics Forum | Fri Dec 21 08:38:54 EST 2018 | msbettyhunt

Yes, I have very good but short experience over there because due to some personal experience I didn't completed my certification in IPC 610 CIS Course but will definitely continue when'll I get the chance. Hopefully, will continue again in next mont

Requirements for a room with SMT equipment

Electronics Forum | Fri Oct 27 10:54:19 EDT 2017 | sumote

Might i suggest reading the IPC-610-F (or any recent revision). Even if you are not going to build to it, you should get some idea of what your product should look like and some basic requirements. A good experienced SMT Engineer sounds like a good

Connector with unique leads

Electronics Forum | Sun Feb 28 13:51:56 EST 2021 | bengill

We have a unique connector with flat leads, i.e. the leads leave the connector body flat parallel to the pads. The leads are without a heel, they are flush with the connector body. Moreover, one can't solder beneath the connector because the leads ar

"Gap" in completed solder joint between lead and pad

Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 28 15:10:50 EST 2006 | M. Sanders

Unfortunately, I don't have a copy of IPC-A-610 D on hand, however, I believe in IPC-610, this �floating height� between lead and pad has no maximum specification restriction. As long as there is no voiding, it is still acceptable for all 3 classes.

Looking for IPC or other standard for electronics / electro-mech

Electronics Forum | Mon May 07 08:46:18 EDT 2001 | CAL

Searching the IPC website is a good start. http://www.ipc.org Some standards you may want to look over are.... IPC 600, IPC 610, J-STD-001 "riveting and circuit cards into metal shelf" definitely has my curiosity level elevated. Since you know your

Can I apply IPC-610 class 3 workmanship standards to an assembly made with a IPC-600 class 2 PCB?

Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 06 11:11:04 EST 2015 | mascott123

I have asked that same question to a co-chair of the J-STD-001 committee who in turn checked with personnel at IPC. The answer I received is that yes you can apply the Class 3 assembly requirements using a class 2 PWB but the resultant assembly will

Confused....Need Help On AS9100

Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 07 22:51:05 EDT 2008 | davef

We expect aerospace to be IPC-A-610, Class 3 and J-STD-001, Class 3. The above quality statement stecifies: * "IPC 610, Class 2 acceptability." This is unclear. Should this be "IPC-A-610, Class 2 acceptability?" * No class for J-STD-001. Should we a


ipc-610... searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information