Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 19 10:44:23 EST 2005 | russ
Although I have not personally run or programmed either the Universal or the Fuji to any great extent, I have worked in factories that have utilized each type. One had 4796 machines and the other used Fuji CP3, 4, 4-2, 6, 643. As an observer I am d
Electronics Forum | Sat Aug 09 12:37:40 EDT 2003 | cyber_wolf
Hello all, I am just curious as to the recovery # people are using on their Fuji chipshooters. One of my co-workers insist that we should run on E-stop. I tell him that we should run on 2 or 3 times and operators should be expected to watch the dump
Electronics Forum | Wed Sep 08 06:11:24 EDT 2004 | Rob
Hi Peter, We're typically seeing 60% on the average subcontract job, but on high volume, high density & well laid out boards we are seeing up to 95% on our chipshooters. The things that usually kill the speed for us are: multiple circuit panels (3
Electronics Forum | Fri May 14 08:07:44 EDT 2004 | cyber_wolf
Well....that's a pretty broad question. We actually run 3 fuji lines that are mid 90's vintage. We run them pretty much 24 hours a day 6 days a week.They run,run,run and hardly ever break .The software....eh..could be a little more user friendly. So
Electronics Forum | Sat May 08 09:59:21 EDT 2004 | fastek
What you need to remember is Fuji didn't make a name for itself by building this XP platform. They're strengths are/were in their chipshooters. Don't just assume that because it's Fuji it won't have reliabilty issues. I'm not sold on this platform ye
Electronics Forum | Sun Mar 07 01:04:21 EST 1999 | Paul Peterson
My printer evaluation has come down to the Fuji GP-6 or the Dek 265LT. I'm looking for experienced opinions on both of these options, we're currently running an older vintage Dek 265 printer that gives us constant electronic system problems. The vis
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 12 10:24:22 EDT 2004 | sdsmt
i worked with cp6s in 1995 and 1996. we always had missing part problems that was machine related. we had to inspect every board for missing parts. it was a disaster, imho, but i expect a chipshooter to consistently load chips. otherwise, it was
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 15 04:54:57 EST 2001 | mattias
Here�s my opinion PanaPro (Panasonic): good balancing/optimization, very easy to setup and use, quick good results, not so good support for third party machines(optimization), Timestamps for balancing/optimization is quite accurate. Cad-conversion?
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 19 11:02:40 EST 2018 | robl
The old YV-112 equates to the old Philips Comet, which had 16 heads. It could only go down to 0603 imperial though. Here it is in it's early 90's glory: https://tools.adoptsmt.com/equipment/?id=14777 Do I think the YSM40R will hit 200K per hour? p
Electronics Forum | Fri May 16 12:14:04 EDT 2003 | pjc
The UIC HSP (Sanyo), like Panasonic MV MS and Fuji CP, are random access turret type chip-shooters. Having a split carriage, typically 2x 60, 2x 70 or 2x 80 input carriage tables, allows for faster changeovers provided you have enough positions on ea
