Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:42:31 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi Simon, Thanks for the immediate reply. We really appreciate it very much. Currently, we are using Class 2 for the visual inspection criteria of our telecom boards. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C criteria, there are TARGET, ACCEPTABLE and REJECT criterias.
Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 06 21:06:29 EST 2000 | Dave F
Does "Dinah-Moe Humm" mean instant disqualification?
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 17 21:14:14 EDT 2000 | hankey_cn
Who can tell me the IPC** about the thermocouple for reflow and rework? I'm waiting....
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 09 09:36:18 EDT 2003 | iman
what r your test running parameters? what end-application?
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 24 09:48:15 EST 1998 | Steve Schrader
| Do you know if there is an IPC standard or industry standard | that addresses the proper process for handling MSD's in the production environment....? (rework etc.) | Not the receiving area. | Thanks so much, | Robin Arnold | PCB Development | Har
Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 08 16:03:29 EDT 2003 | jonfox
MTBF is hard to nail down raw data based on whether or not it is classified as IPC CII or CIII alone. Given that most failures are environmentally based, you might be able to get this data for CII and CIII in similar environmental testing situations
Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 09 12:18:37 EDT 2003 | MA/NY DDave
Hi This is an excellent question or research project. I would call the IPC and find out if anyone has already done this work. My guess is that Class III should be slightly better, yet considering the application difference where Class III is used
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 10 15:20:35 EDT 2003 | MA/NY DDave
Hi DaveyF, Thanks You see, you proved my point, with piles of more information than I gave. Based on Application rather than design and manufacturing specifications, a lower IPC class can out perform another. So our starting Poster must look at t
Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 07:50:04 EDT 2013 | icin
The attached images appear to be a result of a touchup process. We believe that this is not a fracture, but more of a condition where the solder touchup process did not completely flow the solder. Is this acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 08 19:32:52 EDT 1999 | Tom Reilly
FYI, Yes, it is true SMT Plus [ http://www.smtplus.com/ ]does not meet IPC 782 standards but is that the goal here or to meet IPC-A-610 standards for manufacturing? I agree that patterns do cause some problems if created to maximum IPC standards but
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100
