Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 30 21:12:32 EDT 2001 | davef
"Poor release" (paste hanging-up in the stencil holes) could have three main (or combination of) causes: 1 Equipment: Stencil is too thick. Specifically, a 6 thou stencil should be OK, providing you don�t violate the area and aspect ratios in the fi
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 28 07:59:50 EDT 2004 | cyber_wolf
Ken, With all due respect: Surface mount is surface mount. Whether you are placing 0201's, or PLCC84's the basic concept is the same. So I would surely hope that for the most part my process is transferable. I guess I was too broad when I said "we n
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 03 08:14:49 EDT 2001 | Stefan Witte
If you hold your board sideways in a 90 degree angle you apply a force of 1 g to your components. 1 g translates into 32 ft / sec. square. This is not too much acceleration for fearless roller coaster drivers but Melf�s and Tantalums can fall off at
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 09:52:07 EDT 2003 | kmorris
I have just started an assembly which uses a 16 mil pitch QFP. We ran on Saturday, using a type 3 solder paste. (working Sat's really sucks) We really struggled with paste release after the stencil sat for 15 minutes without printing. Apertures clog
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 07 12:21:02 EDT 2003 | davef
Russ is correct. A 5 thou thick stencil should give good release. Here's how you run through it: * You want at least 5 solder particles across the smallest aperture. So in your case, 8 thou wide, which equals to 0.20mm gives us 0.20/5=40 microns.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 09 05:14:56 EST 2006 | abhinavajmera
Hi all, I want to know the possible causes of poor paste release in stencil printing process if the same brand and part number of solder paste that has been used successfully is being used with a set of process parameters which worked before. Other t
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 06 11:09:40 EST 2007 | Cecil
Anyone using Invar Stencils? Do they meet the same level of paste release as electroformed? Pros/Cons
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 31 12:58:44 EDT 2018 | emeto
Paste release is coming from your stencil, so the checkplot is your best reference.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 16:55:19 EDT 2023 | cyber_wolf
Yes I have used it on multiple occasions. The purpose is to potentially help paste release from the stencil.
Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 07 08:45:02 EDT 2017 | dleeper
In my experience with similar sized parts, the nano coatings (or what ever your supplier might call them) do help with repeatable paste release. How are you cleaning your stencils? A big red flag to me is that your stencil worked fine for the first
.gif)
