Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 10 08:01:36 EST 2006 | davef
Look here http://www.smtnet.com/Forums/Index.cfm?CFApp=1&Message_ID=38727
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 13:31:48 EST 2006 | russ
Who exactly is "we".
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 28 14:05:21 EST 2006 | russ
That's what I was trying to find out
Electronics Forum | Sat Apr 08 08:57:58 EDT 2006 | jdumont
Hilarious cuculi...
Electronics Forum | Fri May 05 09:00:46 EDT 2006 | russ
Studies showed that there are no issues mixing SN100C and SAC305, I believe that AIM has this info. Russ
Electronics Forum | Wed May 17 03:40:59 EDT 2006 | aj
Hi , The cost of the SACX is 12 euro/kg. What is the cost of the SN100C
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 13 18:41:12 EDT 2006 | grantp
Hi, Is it possible to have too much flux? Grant
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 13 19:00:17 EDT 2006 | Hoss
Samir's ICT guy says YES.
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 17 07:19:33 EDT 2006 | paulinct
I am also getting ready to order solder for my new wave. Based on what I have read (here and other places) people prefer Sn100c for the wave. I have yet to hear of someone using Sn100c and switching to SACx. I am using SAC305 for reflow and I am tryi
Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 03 22:48:21 EDT 2006 | C.K. the Flip
It sounds as if this Sn100c HASL process is still in its infancy requiring further process development and characterization..weather its a better more active flux or a different profile... Given your situation of the Sn100c coating actually "repellin
