Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 19 20:48:05 EDT 2000 | Dave F
Craig: Waving TSOP should be your last choice. You should resist will high levels of red faced, neck vein bulging seriousness. After you loose: * Philips pads are a good starting point. * Recognize you'll probably have to lay-out the pads on the b
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 18 05:32:09 EDT 2008 | gregoryyork
What volume of boards are you putting through. 1Kg per hour does sound very high but then again it does depend on volume Using an antioxidant is a must with Lead Free some alloys have additions in them to start with but those drop out with use so th
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 21 14:58:04 EDT 2023 | rgduval
I mean...there are a ton of possibilities for bridging on selective solder before you ever get to alloy purity. Are the bridges happening consistently in the same spot? Are the leads too long? Can you modify the approach/exit/peel off to address? Wh
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 17 12:06:58 EST 2007 | pjc
5 Steps to Eliminate Bridges: 1. Establish (wave) Parallelism First and foremost, you must establish board-to-wave parallelism. This is the prerequisite to any wave solder process control. For an understanding of the power of this approach go to ht
Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 17 19:01:45 EST 2007 | bbarton
As someone with a LOT of experience with the "low cost" alternative alloys, primarily SACX, I have one simple question....Are these shorts a new phenomena? WAS your process in control, and all of a sudden it's not? If the answer is YES, take a look a
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 13:14:36 EDT 1999 | Bill Bannister
| | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | I understand 63/37 to be pre
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 10:37:47 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | I understand 63/37 to be pretty
Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 21 14:23:56 EDT 2003 | kenBliss
In order to service your wave solder machine safely, the following needs to be understood. Ladling dross out of the machine and putting it in into a coffee can or similar is not safe and puts operators and other employees at risk. Protecting the se
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 14:09:51 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 29 19:30:44 EDT 1999 | Boca
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
