Electronics Forum | Thu Aug 04 13:58:20 EDT 2016 | sumote
Does anyone have the technical specifications for the Fuji CP6 and the Fuji IP3? Looking for the placement speed (parts per hour), accuracy, smallest/largest component size, fine-pitch (what size it can do). Our new sales guy is putting together some
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 01 08:57:34 EDT 2000 | CAL
We here at ACI run the CP20 or Manncorp version 2000.We are a Research and engineering Company with availablity for demonstrations. We actually love our system (Esp. the cost). Even though our machine is a low end machine we are placing advanced pack
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 08 15:47:15 EDT 2016 | jdengler
You may be able to get the specs from one of the used equipment companies that advertise here. Jerry
Electronics Forum | Thu Nov 30 04:34:39 EST 2017 | robertorocco
Hi sarason The O.S. is win98 not win95. The repair function is chkdsk? Beacause the O.S. not start do you think the start chkdsk from DOS? Thanks Roberto
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 19 02:03:51 EST 2019 | bukas
try first to replace SYS folder, or one by one of its files. if that doesnt work you are looking at complete disk backup. and check disk for bad sectors ofc
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 12 18:26:05 EDT 2002 | pjc
If you are talking actual placement rate- from first fiducial read of board no. 1 to first fiducial read of board no. 2, here is the best I've ever seen based on the boards I've run: CP3- 141 seconds for 468 components per board (all rectangular chi
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 10:08:44 EDT 2002 | dougt
Tony, I'm in Ken's corner.....the speeds the manufacturers offer are pretty much meaningless when it comes down to your particular board. Brand X can say they will do 1,000,000 cph but when you put your board on the machine with multiple parts at di
Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 13 13:34:39 EDT 2002 | soupatech
Thanks for all the input everyone..... At least I have a starting point and have something to compare my actual numbers with. It seems to me the most important thing to worry about is feeders and writing the program correctly. I have spent most of my
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 24 04:02:18 EDT 2004 | kent_peterson
Two ways at it.You could just put the same nozzle for both the min and max.Or you could move the feeder into a location that has similar parts using the nozzle you want. With the feeder setup it should be optimized for the least amount of nozzle ch
Electronics Forum | Sat Jul 24 04:02:21 EDT 2004 | kent_peterson
Two ways at it.You could just put the same nozzle for both the min and max.Or you could move the feeder into a location that has similar parts using the nozzle you want. With the feeder setup it should be optimized for the least amount of nozzle ch
