Printed Circuit Board Assembly & PCB Design Forum

SMT electronics assembly manufacturing forum.

SMTnet
»
Electronics Forum
»
ENIG CONTAMINATION

ENIG CONTAMINATION

Subscribe to Thread

Views: 8836

Hi, in our company, we had performed a failure analysis... - Sep 04, 2009 by XPS

We are seeing similar issues. We have a board that consisten... - Oct 09, 2009 by tstrat

George Milad [National accounts manager of technology, UIC/U... - Oct 10, 2009 by davef

Base on my PCB experience, the contamination issue might cau... - Oct 22, 2009 by Shinsei Technology

--the lead time for ENIG only 6 monnths and need do baking... - Oct 23, 2009 by kircchoffs

So if you have Carbon showing on this would this not mean it... - Oct 23, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

If the contamination came from the SMT process I would have ... - Nov 03, 2009 by tstrat

Ask if they are seeing to much Phosphorous in the SEM or if ... - Nov 03, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

The phosphorous concentration was not elevated w.r.t. levels... - Nov 04, 2009 by tstrat

what level did you have ... - Nov 04, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

It was 7 wt% according to the EDS spectrum at the EN layer n... - Nov 04, 2009 by tstrat

I thought it had to be > 10% Wt ... - Nov 04, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

That is interesting, I have not seen that as a requirement b... - Nov 04, 2009 by tstrat

No Sorry it was just from memory I will try to google it and... - Nov 04, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

I asked our lab about this and received this response: "Typ... - Nov 04, 2009 by tstrat

I see thanks for that ... - Nov 05, 2009 by BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 September, 2009

Hi,

in our company, we had performed a failure analysis on some PCB finishing ENIG faulty, cause detachement of heavy components. So we performed a SEM / EDX analysis on the nickel and we discover a 20 % of carbon instead of the standard 0.04% (on surface and into the nickel). So, now we have discovered that it is the cause of soldering problem, but we found very few study about that. So we need to know the cause of this contamination and its origin. And also we need to know if a serious study exist about it. Thanks

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 9 October, 2009

We are seeing similar issues. We have a board that consistently has failures on a BGA part. After SEM/EDS it was shown that the fractures were occurring between the Ni-P and Ni-Sn intermetallic in the ENIG finish. The element map showed elevated concentrations of Carbon only in the ENIG layer. The lab noted that they had never seen this in the EN layer before. We have submitted a blank PCB of a different date code for analysis.

I would be interested to know how your problem manifested itself and what type of solder/components/paste you were using. In our case, we had lower yield, but the primary issue was failure under mechanical stress (flex, shock, vibration).

Thank you, TAS

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 10 October, 2009

George Milad [National accounts manager of technology, UIC/Uyemura International, gmilad at uyemura.com] is Chairman, IPC Plating Committee. He may be able to steer you towards a solution.

Shinsei Technology

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 22 October, 2009

Base on my PCB experience, the contamination issue might caused by PCB finishing or SMT process (like oven or printing). Before go further, maybe you can check few things. How many PCB affected per lot?? it might be caused by humidity (storage or packing). Remember, the lead time for ENIG only 6 monnths and need do baking before use if those boards was expired.

Alex

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 23 October, 2009

--the lead time for ENIG only 6 monnths and need do baking before use if those boards was expired.

speaking of baking. what is the correct procedure? may i know the temps,time and profile? thanks

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 23 October, 2009

So if you have Carbon showing on this would this not mean it is something Organic contaminating the pad.I have seen this before with solder resist depositing over the pad.

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 3 November, 2009

If the contamination came from the SMT process I would have expected it to be present in the joint above the finish. It is isolated to the EN layer in the ENIG finish. We are doing more analysis to determine the number of boards with the contamination, but there are many board with failures in each of several different lots. The boards were only a few weeks old when assembled and were stored according to spec.

Thanks, tstrat

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 3 November, 2009

Ask if they are seeing to much Phosphorous in the SEM or if they could determine if it is Phosphorous. Could be too much gold Brightener. Also this is not via in pad technology is it.

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

The phosphorous concentration was not elevated w.r.t. levels needed for black pad syndrome. It is not via-in-pad. The component on the board that has been failing is just a standard BGA.

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

what level did you have

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

It was 7 wt% according to the EDS spectrum at the EN layer near the ball-pad interface.

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

I thought it had to be > 10% Wt

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

That is interesting, I have not seen that as a requirement before. From what I read if it is less than 7 wt% the corrosion resistance is pretty low, but if the value is too high it indicates that "black pad" is present from nickel corrosion. From what I could find the appropriate levels from the bath depend on the chemical supplier (typically between 8-14%). Do you have any more information on this? Thanks.

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

No Sorry it was just from memory I will try to google it and see what I can find. I know it is bad to have too thin a Nickel layer and Phos layer. If you find anything can you let me know as well Cheers GREG BLT

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 4 November, 2009

I asked our lab about this and received this response: "Typically 7 - 9wt% phosphorus is used. Higher concentrations (10 - 12 wt% phosphorus) reportedly help prevent Ni-P corrosion during the IG processing step, but they are also reportedly more difficult to solder. Very high concentrations, ~ 28 wt% phosphorus, in a thin layer (~ 0.25 microns thick) at the EN/IG interface are a signature of 'black pad syndrome'. We did not see that problem on the boards you have sent us to date." -tstrat

BLT Circuit Services Ltd

ENIG CONTAMINATION | 5 November, 2009

I see thanks for that

SMTnet
»
Electronics Forum
»
ENIG CONTAMINATION

Nozzles, Feeders, Spare Parts - Siemens, Fuji, Juki, Yamaha, etc...

ZESTRON's product line of cleaning agents are designed to reliably remove solder pastes and SMT adhesives from stencils, screens, and misprinted PCBs. Increase the life of your stencils and make your solder printing process more effective and reliable.

Small Parts Tips for as small as 100 microns

© 1995-2020 SMTnet