CIMBridge versus Unicam

Subscribe to Thread

I and I imagine most of you, are embroiled in the turf war... - Aug 03, 1998 by

Dew: Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fu... - Aug 04, 1998 by

| Dew: | Is this the third or forth software alignment fo... - Aug 04, 1998 by

| | Dew: | | Is this the third or forth software alignm... - Aug 06, 1998 by

| | | | Dew: | | | Is this the third or forth software ... - Aug 31, 1998 by

Dew Lolly

#14804

CIMBridge versus Unicam | 3 August, 1998

I and I imagine most of you, are embroiled in the turf war going on between CIMBridge and Unicam. Since Fuji is squarely in the center of this issue I would imagine that many of you are wondering which way to lean. I'm wondering if we are not going to have to maintain both systems. Opinions?

reply »

Wayne

#14805

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam | 4 August, 1998

Dew: Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... Just my two cents....

reply »

Ben Salisbury

#14806

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam | 4 August, 1998

| Dew: | Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... | Just my two cents.... I believe it's the forth, MCS OS/9, MCXE,F4G, and now fujicam...were there any others I missed? Personally I like the route that fuji has taken with unicam, At least we're one step closer to having the best of all worlds, with ease of use. -Ben

reply »

Jim Price

#14807

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam | 6 August, 1998

| | Dew: | | Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... | | Just my two cents.... | I believe it's the forth, MCS OS/9, MCXE,F4G, and now fujicam...were there any others I missed? | Personally I like the route that fuji has taken with unicam, At least we're one step closer to having the best of all worlds, with ease of use. | -Ben It looks like the Panasert guys have to be enjoying this. They have been light years ahead on all sorts of software issues. Unicam, which puports to support every machine under the sun, even admits they can't optimize a Panasert as well as PanaPRO can. I wonder how well they will do with Fuji?

reply »

Patrick O'Connor

#14808

Re: CIMBridge versus Unicam | 31 August, 1998

| | | | Dew: | | | Is this the third or forth software alignment for Fuji? Hope they stick with Unicam for a period of time... | | | Just my two cents.... | | I believe it's the forth, MCS OS/9, MCXE,F4G, and now fujicam...were there any others I missed? | | Personally I like the route that fuji has taken with unicam, At least we're one step closer to having the best of all worlds, with ease of use. | | -Ben | It looks like the Panasert guys have to be enjoying this. They have been light years ahead on all sorts of software issues. Unicam, which puports to support every machine under the sun, even admits they can't optimize a Panasert as well as PanaPRO can. I wonder how well they will do with Fuji? Anything will be an improvement over their current optimizer. It has improved over the years, but if Fuji thought it was good enough I don't think they would have aligned with Unicam.

reply »