| | We have a design on which there is an ASIC that will not be produced anymore in the future. As we want to make this design over the next 10 years we are evaluating the possibility to buy the necessary ASICs for the next 10 years. This will give us a solderability problem! Is there any way we can stock these ASICs so they will be solderable in 10 years time? | | | Phil - | The suggestions for vacuum or Nitrogen storage are good for reducing surface oxides, but if your package has copper leads with Sn or SnPb finish you will also eventually have a problem with CuSn intermetallics growing from the lead-to-plating interface. | These will consume the available Sn until they reach the surface and affect the solderability. The process is dependent on time and exponentially with (absolute) temperature. Most soldering reference books can help you with this. | If I'm wrong here, some of you old-timer metallurgist types please correct me. | | Glenn Robertson | Glenn
You are not wrong. Au contraire, you are right. However, SnCu intermetallics are not necessarily prohibitive, provided that the surface is activated. IMHO, what is worse is that the formation of SnCus will take place in tin-depleted matrix and the oxidised lead resulting is a real bugger. This assumes the substrate is copper and not FeNi alloys (e.g. Kovar). I have, on occasion, used 10 year-old components which have not been stored in any special environment and the problem is not too severe. In the good old days when it existed, Lonco made a product called Copperbrite, based on an aminosulfonic acid with much surfactant, I believe. It was a wizard for restoring solderability but hellishly difficult to rinse off afterwards.
At the very worst, a pre-re-tin will work wonders. Sorry for the neologism, but I think the hyphens make it clear :-) However, there is an additional word of warning necessary. Can we be sure that tin/lead soldering will exist in 10 years??????????????? Will your package be compatible with whatever you decide should take its place?
Best regards
Brian
reply »