Electronics Forum: 2009 (Page 146 of 283)

ive solder profiles

Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 04 13:13:21 EDT 2008 | patrickbruneel

The 2009M is a water based flux and requires more preheating compared to alcohol based fluxes. After checking real chunks advice you might check if you hear sizzling when the solder touches the board (indicator that the water is not eliminated by you

NEW to Philips Topaz-X need help programming

Electronics Forum | Thu Jan 22 11:15:08 EST 2009 | slthomas

I got mine from my used equipment broker, and it was version 1.5. I would try wherever you get your spares from. My recollection is that the "free" versions (1.5 and older) are not available through Assembleon anymore and that the current version

SN100C Selective Solder Voiding

Electronics Forum | Fri Feb 13 19:51:07 EST 2009 | joeherz

Update Received cross-section analysis for ENIG plated boards and am happy to report that we have no voiding issues. Intermetalics look great and no copper dissolution. No process parameters were changed, only the PCB plating. For now, we are onl

AOI Inspection equipment for populated PCB's

Electronics Forum | Wed Dec 02 06:28:47 EST 2009 | daveyb

That may have been the case a while back and I know this is an a fairly old post, but during this year we had most onsite for trial and the latest MVP software stood out for us (plus I think the rules based method suits us best), plus their support i

Water cleaning and Moisture Entrapment

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 02 08:10:18 EST 2009 | childs

Thanks for the reply Stephen. The time factor sounds logical for moisture invasion during cleaning, probably why there's no articles showing concern about the process. I did try experimenting with some samples and believe it or not could not dupli

Measure Adhesive Properties of Solder Paste

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 06 09:33:06 EST 2009 | blnorman

Years ago when we ran a solder paste evaluation we used the 2.4.44 method mentioned above. What we did was to print several coupons and let them sit for various times to see how the tack changed over time. Our goal was to see how long after print w

X-Ray

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 02 12:19:11 EST 2009 | angiewest

Sorry about having to have a meter on site. Our license is good for 3 years, so we don't have to have it checked often. If our dosimeter report comes back really high or if we just want to have it checked we can thru a local company any time.

X-Ray

Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 05 11:09:11 EST 2009 | davef

These are inexpensive radiation monitoring devices and it is possible, when they are calibrated to a Cesium-137 standard (at 600 keV), for the meter to read higher than the actual value at lower x-ray photon energies. [Glennbrook Technologies Caution

X-Ray

Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 09 18:43:07 EST 2009 | focalspot

Give a call into FocalSpot at 858-536-5050...Our website http://www.focalspot.com also has info...we have all the information including the recent changes in Mexico , but suffice it to say we can provide guidance andf contacts for all states. After a

Business Survey

Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 07 08:34:19 EST 2009 | rgduval

So far so good over here. We did 60% growth over the past two years; and the early indicators are that another 30% is doable for us. We're a small CM; just at 10 employees; but growing. Good mix of industries served. I think that and our niche of


2009 searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information