Electronics Forum | Tue Apr 11 10:41:58 EDT 2006 | dsuraski
Cuculi, I'm sorry to hear this. AIM prides itself on our service and support, but clearly something fell through the cracks here. If you would, please contact me offline at dsuraski@aimsolder.com and I will make sure that you receive the support y
Electronics Forum | Wed May 07 15:36:04 EDT 2008 | llaerum
The 483 is what we use on all boards except on one where the 353 improved wetting on resistor packs. It worked much better since the parts are LF and this is the same flux AIM uses in their LF solder. Yes, it was recommended by AIM when we discussed
Electronics Forum | Thu Apr 16 10:08:56 EDT 2009 | waveroom
Sorry for the delay. We are actually pretty busy over here. We have found the Aim 257-2 no-clean sac305 paste offers very little if any voiding and better wetting in lead free terminated devices. My suggestion is contact your local Aim distributor fo
Electronics Forum | Fri Apr 17 09:39:07 EDT 2009 | rkevin
I received my sample jar of NC257-2 SAC305 from Aim, and while that may have been true about older Aim paste formulations, this stuff prints and reflows better than anything I have tried and more importantly there were practically no voids on a 256 B
Electronics Forum | Mon Aug 30 10:17:16 EDT 2010 | markgray
We currently use this devise in one of our designs with no issues. We are using a 3mil stencil and a 45% apperature reduction. It is virtually impossible to eliminate voids but they are in an acceptable range. Solder balls are caused on this componen
Electronics Forum | Tue Dec 04 14:16:32 EST 2012 | eniac
AIM can give a good result, I tried the solder paste from many manufacturer - AIM, Kester, Indium, Koki, Alpha Metals, Heraeus - but I stopped my choice at Kester. For example, right now I have EM907 with date of manufacture in february 2010 (it's ju
Electronics Forum | Tue Feb 24 06:44:50 EST 2015 | bugarin
Hello , We are using Kester 959T flux and we wish to purchase Aim Ws 716 flux, due to higher activity. We also use humiseal 1a33 for conformal coating. Is anyone using Aim flux and humiseal 1A33, are they compatible ? Thank you for info
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 03 20:21:26 EDT 2002 | alex_kirichenko
Thanks for responding..... The question I was trying to ask is if U appetures are mechanicaly strong, if the tab in the middle won't stik up and damage squeegee blades? I never had stencil with such appeturs. We are just about to start some trials
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 04 12:00:56 EST 2004 | tryn
I am looking at two different type fluxes, Kester 951nc and AIM 264-5nc. The two seem to be comparable, but the Kester is listed as an ORL0 and the AIM as a ROL0. My product builds are all military and I have been dictated to use only ROl0 flux. I kn
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 28 10:11:27 EST 2005 | jbrower
Hi Ing, My suggestion is to take a good look at your profile(s). The Wave solder machine that I use is an Electrovert EPK I. I use Aim ultra pure 63/37 solder with an older kester flux, 920CFX. I recently switched from kester ultrapure to the aim ba
