Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 01 17:36:31 EST 2018 | spoiltforchoice
I wouldn't touch one of these Chinese machines if a reliable "no headaches" experience is what you are after. I'm sure they do OK for whatever it is they are designed for, but actual volume production not so much. As others have said, proper machines
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 29 10:11:02 EDT 2019 | cyber_wolf
“For a number of years now, work has been proceeding in order to bring perfection to the crudely conceived idea of a transmission that would not only supply inverse reactive current for use in unilateral phase detractors, but would also be capable of
Electronics Forum | Mon Sep 23 06:29:03 EDT 2019 | spoiltforchoice
Essemtec machines are quite good for small batch production. However you do need to bear in mind the FLX is quite small and depending how you use it and the options fitted might be limited on feeder count. You don't mention if this FLX is laser or
Electronics Forum | Wed Oct 06 03:58:25 EDT 1999 | Brian
| | Hi, | | | | Help! Could anyone help to enlighten me on this? | | | | Question: | | | | If I have a CSP/BGA package of size X by Y and the standoff gap between the component and PCB is Z, What is the maximum allowable Y/Z or X/Z that using a n
Electronics Forum | Fri May 14 16:08:38 EDT 1999 | Chrys Shea
| | | | | I am looking for anyone who has converted over to VOC Free flux. I need some info on any problems, etc. that you might have had. | | | | | | | | | | Please E-mail me at wes.ruggles@vickers-systems.com or call at (513) 494-5229 | | | | | |
Electronics Forum | Mon May 03 18:11:10 EDT 1999 | Steve Gregory
Hi Ya' John! Here's my comeback to the points you've raised...you knew I would have a comeback, didn't ya'? |Steve, | | I see your point, and yes there are alot bigger fish to fry in |the removal or control of lead in the environment. However even
Electronics Forum | Mon May 03 18:11:32 EDT 1999 | Steve Gregory
Hi Ya' John! Here's my comeback to the points you've raised...you knew I would have a comeback, didn't ya'? |Steve, | | I see your point, and yes there are alot bigger fish to fry in |the removal or control of lead in the environment. However even
Electronics Forum | Tue May 04 14:37:44 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| Hi Ya' John! | | Here's my comeback to the points you've raised...you knew I would have a comeback, didn't ya'? | | |Steve, | | | | I see your point, and yes there are alot bigger fish to fry in |the removal or control of lead in the environment
Electronics Forum | Wed Jan 13 20:44:42 EST 1999 | Steve Gregory
Hello Sanjay! The cheap deal I use that Earl spoke of is called a SMarT Measure. It's a depth measuring microscope that uses the same principle of measuring optical focus that the units from Vision Engineering do ( if you've ever looked at any
Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 15:27:36 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| | | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and s
