Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 19 22:52:50 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| Good Day All!! | I hope ya'll had a decent weekend, I did...didn't do a damn thing, I like weekends like that. Anyways, the big guys here are thinking about buying a "Flying Probe" tester, and the G.M. came to me and asked what I thought of them.
Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 12 07:22:52 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| | | | | Is there any problem using SMT on gold boards? 15 years ago we were told not to use gold boards, but I can't remember why. Judging by the other postings it now appears to be common. Only problem I see is that the nickel should be plated,
Electronics Forum | Thu Jun 25 14:41:07 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| Alright gentlemen and ladies of the forum, I again seek knowlage on what is probably a well known fact. I have spent a good part of the morning with various IPC standards and weighty tomes such as the Electronic Packaging and Interconnection Handb
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 30 11:12:19 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| | | WHAT IS THE BEST ANGLE FOR THE SQUEEGEE BLADE TO BE ANGLED AT? WE ARE USING 45 DEGREE ON OUR POLYURETHANE BLADES, AND I BELIVE WE HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER 45 OR 60 DEGREES ON OUR METAL BLADES. WHICH OF THE TWO IS BETTER, OR SHOULD WE BE USIN
Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 30 15:02:55 EDT 1998 | justin
| | | | WHAT IS THE BEST ANGLE FOR THE SQUEEGEE BLADE TO BE ANGLED AT? WE ARE USING 45 DEGREE ON OUR POLYURETHANE BLADES, AND I BELIVE WE HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER 45 OR 60 DEGREES ON OUR METAL BLADES. WHICH OF THE TWO IS BETTER, OR SHOULD WE BE US
Electronics Forum | Fri Jul 03 09:19:21 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| | | | | WHAT IS THE BEST ANGLE FOR THE SQUEEGEE BLADE TO BE ANGLED AT? WE ARE USING 45 DEGREE ON OUR POLYURETHANE BLADES, AND I BELIVE WE HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER 45 OR 60 DEGREES ON OUR METAL BLADES. WHICH OF THE TWO IS BETTER, OR SHOULD WE BE
Electronics Forum | Fri May 29 17:19:54 EDT 1998 | Earl Moon
| | | | Thanks Steve- | | Here is the whole story: | | | | The solder balls are appearing all over, similar to a | | splatter. They are relatively small. We are using H-Technologies | | S-HQ no-clean solder paste. The stencil is 6 mil and the
Electronics Forum | Thu May 21 09:54:07 EDT 1998 | Justin Medernach
| I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and solde
Electronics Forum | Tue May 26 14:50:07 EDT 1998 | Dave F
| | I'm reviewing my board fab spec. It calls for a minimum SnPb thickness of 50 microinches on HASL PWB's. I've looked at other specs that call out anything from 30 to 80 microinches, and others that just say the copper pad must be covered and sol
Electronics Forum | Thu May 30 10:31:03 EDT 2002 | robbied
Hi Yannick. This is an issue that we are just recently getting into but here is some ifo that I have gathered so far. I have seen/ used 2 different rework machines. The one we have bought is a 'PACE TF2000' which was at the lower cost end of the mar
