Electronics Forum | Mon Dec 06 10:53:42 EST 1999 | Ron Lahat
Our CEM running No clean process on our PCBAs Should we verify that he is using the Deionized water rinsing or is it a default in the process ?
Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 19 12:37:46 EST 2004 | MRMAINT
LOOKING FOR THE PROS AND CONS OF BOTH WATER SOLUBLE AND NO CLEAN PROCESS MATERIALS AS IT APPLIES TO BGA REFLOW.IS IT POSSIBLE TO REMOVE ALL W/S FLUX AFTER INLINE WASHING. THANKS MRMAINT
Electronics Forum | Sun Mar 06 13:47:36 EST 2011 | rogerk
Can someone share their knowledge of the disadvantage of using saponifier cleaning process? your help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, RK
Electronics Forum | Fri Mar 20 12:30:45 EST 1998 | Bill Schreiber
Smart Sonic introduces the first "No Risk" Guarantee for SMT Stencil Cleaners. No more shopping for a machine from one vendor, a chemical from another vendor and waste treatment process from a third vendor. Only to discover when the process fa
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 25 16:26:43 EST 2003 | tdurston
We are trying to establish requirements and process controls for completed, cleaned SMT assemblies. We have problems with our high impedance circuits (100 meg ohms) being affected by residue. Some boards require additional cleaning cycles to remove
Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 28 12:39:22 EDT 1999 | Kenny Vaughn
I have just purchased an EMC CyberClean Series 1000 stencil cleaner(jet spray non-rinsing system). I will be using it to clean misprints, stencils, and residues off of completed prototype assemblies. We are strictly a no-clean process and was looki
Electronics Forum | Mon Nov 14 10:46:48 EST 2011 | dyoungquist
Have you tried an ultrasonic water cleaning process? We use an ultrasonic cleaner with tap water and Omega Aqua Clean LPH cleaner (omegasonics.com) then rinse with DI water. However, our cleaning requirements are not as strict as yours are from the
Electronics Forum | Thu Dec 08 12:39:39 EST 2016 | deanm
We have a name brand aqueous batch cleaner that uses a chemical and DI water to clean ROL0 flux from our PCBs. It does ok most of the time for SMT boards and we want to include through hole assemblies as well which should be a better cleaning process
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 23 07:28:42 EDT 2012 | ccottreau
Has anybody any experience in cleaning the Jupiter 32 LGA in a Aqueous cleaning process (or any kind of shielded GPS Module). The manufacture does not recommend Aqueous cleaning because that length of drying time and that this may leave residue on th
Electronics Forum | Sun Aug 13 00:15:58 EDT 2017 | deanm
We manufacture low volume, high reliability assemblies (class 3) that are conformal coated. Up until now we have been cleaning after SMT, then after through hole, then immediately prior to coating with test, formal inspection, etc. between cleaning p
