Electronics Forum: compatibility (Page 36 of 53)

SWITCHING OF WAVE SOLDER MACHINE FROM LEADED TO NO-LEAD

Electronics Forum | Fri Aug 12 21:12:34 EDT 2005 | fctassembly

Hello Pete, I am not aware of any Wave solder machine manufacturer selling new pots from SS without being "LF compatible". Who would buy it now?? Also, machine warranties generally are no longer than 1 year anyway so all existing machines over 1 year

Lead-Free qualification process

Electronics Forum | Wed Aug 24 09:52:26 EDT 2005 | javi

Patric, The product is exempted from the RoHS regulativ 1'st phase(2010) and our policy is to follow the new EU regulations as this will also push the Industri technolegy and the SMT process. Our concern is more that we are not able to qualify the p

delamination test

Electronics Forum | Tue Aug 23 16:57:29 EDT 2005 | HOSS

50% of seeing it in a single pass. The only time we do this is if we have a board off the line that has delaminated. We'll run a sample of boards through bare to confirm that we have a bad batch. Even if we see no failures on the bare boards, we'l

RoHS parts - leaded solder

Electronics Forum | Tue Oct 25 16:27:46 EDT 2005 | stepheniii

It is not OK to use leadfree BGA's with a lead process. Other parts "should" be reverse compatable. But I first saw problems over 5 years ago with Paladium leads and a lead process. Don't confuse saying "it's ok to use lead free parts in a leaded p

Universal Advantis

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 31 10:54:05 EST 2005 | Rob

Hi Vickt, Future upgrades on machine software should be free when they fix known bugs/problems. However these are usually sold as upgrades with additional benefits thrown in. That's just hiding the fact there was a problem in the first place, an

Universal Advantis

Electronics Forum | Mon Oct 31 12:03:49 EST 2005 | vickt

Rob..... First off...Sorry if you have had an issue in the past, but please know that not every customer has your opinion about our legacy software. UIC's policy is not to charge for s/w "fixes" for at least the first year from initial purchase. We f

Solder Paste Evaluation

Electronics Forum | Thu Feb 02 09:06:53 EST 2006 | drewake

Sorry, I am jumping into this late - I'm a new user. Our company is looking to perform an evaluation for a new paste. We are looking at a 63/37 no clean - type 3 or 4. Our technology is currently at 0201s, .4mm pitch ICs & .5mm uBGAs. I have

saponifiers compatible with CPVC

Electronics Forum | Mon Jan 16 16:11:25 EST 2006 | slthomas

We currently use Armakleen E-2001WS in our Trieber inline cleaner and I'm trying to review the process and look into upgrading the chemistry if it's appropriate. After a little research I've concluded that I don't have nearly the information I need t

saponifiers compatible with CPVC

Electronics Forum | Tue Jan 17 10:53:05 EST 2006 | sarar

Hi Steve, I work for an analytical laboratory that specializes in ionic cleanliness, and we have found through the variety of cleanliness issues we encounter that the Envirosense cleaning chemistries are very effective also, so you might want to add

Masking of PWBs prior to conformal coat

Electronics Forum | Wed Apr 19 16:43:05 EDT 2006 | samir

Silicone-based coatings "repel" most foreign,non-compatible materials like peelable solder mask, and rubber or vinyl boots. The result is, uncured material around the vicinity of where the boot was. Trust me. Been there and done that. As a rookie


compatibility searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information