Electronics Forum | Fri Jan 25 11:49:09 EST 2008 | toddl
Hi all, I have an inconsistent situation. Lately, we seem to have excessive dross buildup in the solder pot which inturn causes the pot to overflow. Has anyone had a similar experience? Here are the details: age of machine= 9 years, flux used= Kester
Electronics Forum | Tue Mar 15 12:20:47 EST 2005 | Material Man
The use of nitrogen in lead free wave solder operations is primarily used to reduce or even eliminate drossing of the solder, thus improving solder yield. The higher priced lead free solder makeup (Cu, Ag) make this a more economical proces than the
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 09 17:26:13 EST 1999 | Dave F
Horace: You weren't real specific about the set-up of the two machines. So what's the diff man?? Big dross generators are: 1 R Woodgate says that pump speed is the biggest driver to dross production 2 Chrys uses low dross cast bar: Alpha HiFlo 3
Electronics Forum | Mon Feb 07 13:26:14 EST 2000 | Dave F
Spacerwoman: Carol is a professional spacer problem fighter (we think). When people have problems with spacers, they call on SPACERWOMAN!!!!! Here she is to save the day � ;-) Selecting a spacer made of brass is a good choice for many applicatio
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 10:37:47 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | I understand 63/37 to be pretty
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 13:14:36 EDT 1999 | Bill Bannister
| | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | I understand 63/37 to be pre
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 14:09:51 EDT 1999 | JohnW
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
Electronics Forum | Thu Jul 29 19:30:44 EDT 1999 | Boca
| | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | I understand 63/37 to be
Electronics Forum | Wed May 09 10:40:10 EDT 2001 | davef
First, your primary side component pads should be designed according to SM-782A, "Surface Mount design & Land Pattern Standard". Next if you did that and your secondary side component pads are the same size as your primary side components, your diff
Electronics Forum | Tue Jul 27 14:56:23 EDT 1999 | John Thorup
| | | | We are currently using a 65/35 solder for our wave process but are considering switching to a 63/37 for a substantial cost savings. No one here seems to know why we everused a 65/35 formulation in the first place. | | | | I understand 63/37 t
