Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 11:00:04 EST 2005 | PeteP
In a nutshell, what are the Rev D changes to the standards? What re-certification requirements are in place?
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 16:33:24 EST 2005 | pjc
Revision D has over 730 new and updated illustrations of acceptability criteria and has been critically reviewed for clarity and accuracy. The document synchronizes to the requirements expressed in other industry consensus documents and is used with
Electronics Forum | Thu Mar 03 16:41:11 EST 2005 | davef
According to an on-line posting ... SMTA On-line Presentation Comparing Industry Standard Revisions March 9: IPC-A-610 with Regards to Lead-free Technology There have been extensive and significant changes to the industry standard IPC-A-610 with th
Electronics Forum | Tue Nov 11 17:35:08 EST 2008 | davef
SM-840, is a material qualification document only, with all the test requirements applicable only to a defined test coupon, not to production boards. So, it's useless for what you're trying to accomplish. As assemblers use A-610 - Acceptability Of E
Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 07:18:51 EDT 2017 | jamesbarnhart
IPC has updated assembly standards for IPC A-610 and IPC JSTD-001 making them easier to use and adding information in areas that have evolved. Both IPC J-STD-001E and IPC-A-610E have also been more closely linked to eliminating the differences that c
Electronics Forum | Wed Feb 28 00:01:47 EST 2007 | Muhammad Haris
Hi, The distance between the two terminations/endings/pads of 0603 (0201)is 0.15mm i.e. lesser than than the distance between the 0603 and through hole i.e. 0.5mm My ques is that, then why its termination doesnot short as it has a minimum distance.A
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:07:07 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi, We would like to know on the IPC-A-610 rev. C standard for acceptable and reject criteria, do we have to satisfy all that are listed on the manual or either one will be OK? Thanks for all the assistance that will provided. Dennis1
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 09:42:31 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi Simon, Thanks for the immediate reply. We really appreciate it very much. Currently, we are using Class 2 for the visual inspection criteria of our telecom boards. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C criteria, there are TARGET, ACCEPTABLE and REJECT criterias.
Electronics Forum | Wed Nov 03 14:46:29 EST 2004 | dramos1
Hi Russ, Thanks for the reply. In IPC-A-610 Rev. C on section 5.2.9 {Mounting - Connectors] page 5-21 on the manual [January 2000], the acceptable class [1,2,3]listed 3 items. In order for the connector to be accepted, are all 3 items must be met? I
Electronics Forum | Mon Apr 25 11:24:31 EDT 2005 | Daan Terstegge
I have a question about inspection, touch-up, and how far you need to go to get a product that meets the required IPC-spec. According to some reports (i.e. "New Study Reveals Component Defect Levels" by Stig Oresjo of Agilent) the average defect leve
| 1 |
IPC is the trade association for the printed wiring board and electronics assembly industries.
Training Provider / Events Organizer / Association / Non-Profit
3000 Lakeside Drive, 309 S
Bannockburn, IL USA
Phone: 847-615-7100
