Electronics Forum: j-std-001 and pdf (Page 1 of 9)

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 18 11:49:59 EDT 2007 | davef

The auditor may be using "verify" in an ESD Program context. See ANSI/ESD S20.20 [1999], 6.1.3, Compliance Verification Plan. It gives one definition of what the auditor may be seeking. For more on verification programs, look here: http://www.protek

Humidity and temperature

Electronics Forum | Thu Sep 15 08:39:10 EDT 2016 | davef

J-STD-001 Revision F with Amendment 1

IPC-A-610 and IPC J-STD-001 Updations

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 07:18:51 EDT 2017 | jamesbarnhart

IPC has updated assembly standards for IPC A-610 and IPC JSTD-001 making them easier to use and adding information in areas that have evolved. Both IPC J-STD-001E and IPC-A-610E have also been more closely linked to eliminating the differences that c

IPC-A-610 and IPC J-STD-001 Updations

Electronics Forum | Mon Jul 24 09:15:32 EDT 2017 | davef

James: This is not "breaking news." IPC-A-610F, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies was released in July 2014. Both, ... * IPC-A-610G, Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies * J-STD-001G, Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assem

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 07:50:04 EDT 2013 | icin

The attached images appear to be a result of a touchup process. We believe that this is not a fracture, but more of a condition where the solder touchup process did not completely flow the solder. Is this acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 18 10:35:41 EDT 2007 | hussman

This seems like an odd request from an auditor. I can see an auditor requiring proof that you meet the J-Std, but verify? This would require you purposely damage product on a "before and after" scenario. As long as your manufacturing guideline say

J-STD-002 and -003 solderability testing...

Electronics Forum | Fri Jun 29 14:15:00 EDT 2001 | stefo

This is a question about complying with J-STD-001 solderability testing. Do any of you have your vendors certify that the components and PCB's that you buy from them comply with the solderabilty requirements spelled out in the -002 and -003, in lieu

Flux Designations and Composition

Electronics Forum | Tue Jun 29 14:42:55 EDT 2004 | davef

You're correct, for every dumpster full of paper written about solder, there's a sentance written about fluxes. There's dribs and drabs about fluxes in most of the soldering books [ie, Manko, Klein-Wassink, Judd, Strauss, etc] and most of that is ve

J-STD-001 Par 4.2.2 Temperature and Humidity

Electronics Forum | Wed Jul 11 14:44:21 EDT 2007 | fredericksr

Hi folks! Has anyone ever successfully verified adequate ESD control at

Acceptable per J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610 Class 3?

Electronics Forum | Thu May 23 18:10:54 EDT 2013 | davef

I agree with Rob. These solder connections are unacceptable. BR, davef

  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next

j-std-001 and pdf searches for Companies, Equipment, Machines, Suppliers & Information